What about making "Magic Helmet" a general trait ?

Got some ideas for rules? Maybe a skill change or something completely different!!! Tell us here.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
Toby

What about making "Magic Helmet" a general trait ?

Post by Toby »

nt

Reason: ''
voyagers_uk
Da Cynic
Posts: 7462
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

Post by voyagers_uk »

I thought this would be better served in House rules, as it is up to you Toby. +1 to AV for a general trait rather than as a magic item which would be available for use by anyone including those without general skill access.

Halfling/Goblin and Skink coaches may not like the idea.

How would you sell it though in terms of fluff?

Reason: ''
Toby

Post by Toby »

its just that i wonder how to include magic helmet without the cards Voyagers_UK...

Reason: ''
voyagers_uk
Da Cynic
Posts: 7462
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

it is up to you

Post by voyagers_uk »

I love some of the effects of the cards and as I understand it the BBRC are looking at finding a way to bring some of that flavour back in.

Personally we use the On-pitch Spellcasters from the MBBL2, they are racially diverse yet all have conjure which can produce a magic item on a 3+ for your team once a game. You can still only cast in your own turn and the spell guy can earn Spp's like everyone else he suffers from -1AV but can get magic helmet to balance it out. We love them so far.

Check them out, they add a sense of fun to a lineman who can do things no one else can, it also means that the opponent has to remember which guy it is. Some of the racial spells are quite good for turning moments of the game.

Reason: ''
Toby

Post by Toby »

i am sitting over the permantent starplayer system (that will be brilliant ;)) and theres no way to create a +1AV that is compatible to LRB.
So i removed all +1AV from the stars. The Rule is called "Magic Helmets removed" but i am not quite happy with it. +1 AV would be a good way to waste a star player roll on a Star...

can you give me a hint about the new secret weapon system ? i would like to remove secret weapons from stars (that means from the star player rolls)

Reason: ''
voyagers_uk
Da Cynic
Posts: 7462
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

Post by voyagers_uk »

I know nothing but I think something is due in BBmags 3-5

Reason: ''
ljm
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 11:22 pm
Location: Oulu, Finland

Post by ljm »

There´s already Spikes in Physical Traits, so if you wish I don´t see why you couldn´t move it to General and rename it "Magic Helmet". Personally I´d like to see magic item rules including MH and many other items you could acquire.

ljm

Reason: ''
Toby

Post by Toby »

Voyagers, ljm

if People are so much against Star Players that would effectively be Skills accuired by money, how would they like Items that would do the same ? effectively giving you skills and player characteristics in exchange for money ?

I think money should be in the game, as should stars, purchaseable items, special plays, and secret weapons.

Buy a Star that gives you a Blitzer with 2 Skills
Buy a Healing Scroll that gives you an extra Apothecarie (one use)
Buy a Magic Helmet that increases one players armour.

Why not ?

Reason: ''
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Post by GalakStarscraper »

Side note to VUK:

I'm typing up the spellcaster rules now that they've been tested for 2+ years for Andy. Hopefully they'll make an appearance in a future BBM.

Galak

Reason: ''
voyagers_uk
Da Cynic
Posts: 7462
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!

Post by voyagers_uk »

Yippee,

A solid set of rules that both work, are not overpowering and allow magic stuff back in.

hope it reaches print soon.

well done

Reason: ''
McDeth
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3016
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Worcester, England
Contact:

Post by McDeth »

using it as a general trait is not the right way of bringing it into the game, its suggesting that somehow a player suddenly gains a +1AV as a skill increase. as a physical ability possibly but you dont just suddenly gain a skill such as +1AV

Reason: ''
Acerak
Rulz Guru
Posts: 801
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Amherst, NY
Contact:

Post by Acerak »

Magic Item rules will return in the near future. Same with Dirty Tricks and Special Plays. (And hey, maybe even Random Events!) Just be patient :)

-Chet

Reason: ''
Sputnik
Loretta
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 6:47 am
Location: Germany

Post by Sputnik »

I think you should leave it as a possibility for those who can get physical abilities.

Don' t make the teams with AV7 get rid of their weakness". Not for money, not for a double!

Sputnik

Reason: ''
bingbong186
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 1:58 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Post by bingbong186 »

In my local league we've house ruled a player to be allowed a choice of purchasing a Magic Helmet on a skill roll of 11 for 40,000 GC, instead of taking an agility increase.

Fluff wise I'm not sure- how about this;
"The player develops an increase in his agility, but instead of taking this to the Blood Bowl field, he uses it for less ummmm..... legal purposes, and follows a wizard to his residence, waits till nightfall/wizard to leave, and burgles his house."

Sort of made that up on the spot, sounded ok though :D

Reason: ''
Cheers

Bingbong
Toby

Post by Toby »

General Trait would not be accesible to goblins and Halflings. Wood Elfes, Skaven and some others would have to WASTE a Star Player Roll.


"Spikes" (Pysical Trait) changed to "Spiked Helmet" (General Trait)

Perfect :D

Reason: ''
Post Reply