Bretonnian Team Roster if anyone needs it:

Bakunin · Post by **Bakunin** » Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:14 pm

...

BRETONNIA.png

Heff · Post by **Heff** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 12:19 am

Do I hate that roster? Shall I count the ways?

DinoTitanedition · Post by **DinoTitanedition** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 6:35 pm

Well, you could just stay positive, especially for new people coming to the forum and simply say nothing if you don`t like it. I mean....only if you want to leave a good impression....you don`t have to Heff

TomB · Post by **TomB** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 7:51 pm

Looks fine to me. I'd love a 1 page PDF with this, khorne, slann, chaos pact and underworld

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Heff · Post by **Heff** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 7:59 pm

If you want a positive. At least they are not dwarves.

I hate every position. Why are the peasants AG2?
Why do the Yeomen have Str access?
Why are the knights so ridiculously overpowered.
Why are the re rolls so expensive?
Thanks for putting it up. But sorry it is garbage. Unnecessary garbage at that.

Dark Duke · Post by **Dark Duke** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:07 pm

Just for the record, that's not the roster that is uploaded at the NAF's website; there, blitzers don't have access to agility skills on a normal roll, only on doubles.

Regash · Post by **Regash** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:23 pm

DinoTitanedition wrote:simply say nothing if you don`t like it

And that's just not the idea of a forum.
There should be discussions here, only applauding posts are meaningless.
Also, it will leave the impression that everyone like it, as noone is going against it.

Makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

plasmoid · Post by **plasmoid** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:39 pm

Hi all,

TomB:

I'd love a 1 page PDF with this, khorne, slann, chaos pact and underworld

I could get you a 2-page pdf no problem - but it is hard to fit 5 teams onto 1 page

Dark Duke:

Just for the record, that's not the roster that is uploaded at the NAF's website; there, blitzers don't have access to agility skills on a normal roll, only on doubles.

Cyanide changed the roster a few months ago.
I'm assuming NAF wants to host the Cyanide roster, so that needs fixing.

Cheers
Martin

BillyDee · Post by **BillyDee** » Sun Dec 04, 2016 8:40 pm

viewforum.php?f=16

AllyRdr · Post by **AllyRdr** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:44 am

Heff wrote:

Why are the peasants AG2?

Probably rickets as a result of a poor diet.

sann0638 · Post by **sann0638** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:04 am

Yep, good nudge to update.

babass · Post by **babass** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 7:24 am

blitzer have A-skill access on simple now? :shock:

dode74 · Post by **dode74** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:19 am

babass wrote:blitzer have A-skill access on simple now? :shock:

Yeah, buff on BB2. Not sure it was entirely necessary, but it's not a bad one. Brets vs Skaven in the first final of the Champion Ladder in BB2, too...

Bakunin · Post by **Bakunin** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:45 pm

As I understand it, Brets Where at 45% win - now they are up to 50% with A-acess. So the team seems to be in the sweet spot now.

Anyways, All the good natured teams in Blood Bowl are so utterly boring (minus the pro elfs cuz of NoS).

So I like the roster because it leads it self to have some shiny figures with good roster design.
Starting Fend & Wreste - awsome, and with dauntless you dont need a big guy or STR4
And now you have some flashy Blitzers that want to take the ball and score.

I will try and master them before they get a official GW release

dode74 · Post by **dode74** » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:58 pm

Bakunin wrote:As I understand it, Brets Where at 45% win - now they are up to 50% with A-acess. So the team seems to be in the sweet spot now.

The margin of error on the 45% was large enough that it went over 50%, iirc. So we can't say they weren't already in the "sweet spot" you've decided on. We can say they were in the T1 and T1.5 sweet spots as defined by the BBRC, though. What we didn't (and don't) know is which tier they are supposed to be.

Talk Fantasy Football