Just to confirm what we thought it was the correct sequence.
Player A push Player 1 into a Player 2 who has side step.
Which are the correct sequence?
-Push -Side Step -Follow Up
or
-Push -Follow Up -Side Step
We use the first one that feels the most logical but we can't find anything in the rulebook to confirm it.
If the correct is the second option, after the push, the side stepper can move to the space where was his mate and avoid the follow up. Looks weird to us that option but... just checking.
Chain push and side step
Moderator: TFF Mods
- dreamscreator
- Star Player
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:03 pm
- Location: Valencia (Spain)
- Contact:
Chain push and side step
Reason: ''
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 7:44 am
Re: Chain push and side step
player 1 push announced, player 2 side step or push (sidestep not mandatory), player 1 moved into player 2s vacant square, blocker follow up, (armour roll).
Reason: ''
- dreamscreator
- Star Player
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:03 pm
- Location: Valencia (Spain)
- Contact:
Re: Chain push and side step
Yes, that was our understanding.kyrre wrote:player 1 push announced, player 2 side step or push (sidestep not mandatory), player 1 moved into player 2s vacant square, blocker follow up, (armour roll).
Reason: ''
- lunchmoney
- Legend
- Posts: 9011
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Dark Future
Re: Chain push and side step
+1
kyrre wrote:player 1 push announced, player 2 side step or push (sidestep not mandatory), player 1 moved into player 2s vacant square, blocker follow up, (armour roll).
Reason: ''
Hired Goon for the NAF (rep for South West England, and UK approval staff)

lunchmoneybb @ gmail.com
TOs! You do not need multiple copies of rosters. It's a waste of paper.
Bribe level: good coffee.
#FlingNation find me on page 95
lunchmoneybb @ gmail.com
TOs! You do not need multiple copies of rosters. It's a waste of paper.
Bribe level: good coffee.
#FlingNation find me on page 95