Foul ejection/bribe logistical question

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Pagan
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 216
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:52 am
Location: Aiea, HI
Contact:

Re: Foul ejection/bribe logistical question

Post by Pagan »

I'd be taking Sneaky Git and Dirty Player
Then you do nothing but lose since your players spend every turn standing up.

Reason: ''
User avatar
B SIDE
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Lost Wages, NV

Re: Foul ejection/bribe logistical question

Post by B SIDE »

Giving SPP for fouling doesn't increase the effectiveness of fouling in the game. So your DP gets his second skill sooner, but is a significant advantage? I think it probably isn't if you're making any effort to optimize TV.

Reason: ''
Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito.
User avatar
daloonieshaman
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:58 pm
Location: Pasadena California
Contact:

Re: Foul ejection/bribe logistical question

Post by daloonieshaman »

B SIDE wrote:Giving SPP for fouling doesn't increase the effectiveness of fouling in the game. So your DP gets his second skill sooner, but is a significant advantage? I think it probably isn't if you're making any effort to optimize TV.
The same argument can be made about normal causalities

Reason: ''
Image
2014 Chaos Cup Stunty Cup
User avatar
B SIDE
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Lost Wages, NV

Re: Foul ejection/bribe logistical question

Post by B SIDE »

daloonieshaman wrote:
B SIDE wrote:Giving SPP for fouling doesn't increase the effectiveness of fouling in the game. So your DP gets his second skill sooner, but is a significant advantage? I think it probably isn't if you're making any effort to optimize TV.
The same argument can be made about normal causalities
You could make that argument. But blockers become increasingly effective as they gain second and third skills, while dedicated foulers may reasonably considered "bloated" when they reach 16 or 31 SPP's.

Reason: ''
Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito.
User avatar
Daht
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 353
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 3:31 am
Location: Las Vegas

Re: Foul ejection/bribe logistical question

Post by Daht »

Also aside from pure agi teams or specialized catcher types, you need a doubles roll for a dedicated fouler to get both fouling skills.. so if you are minmaxing your team value most bashy teams need a LOT of luck to get a streamlined fouler, and frankly the agi teams can use a small advantage in the hurt department in general for persistant leagues.

Reason: ''
Image
Post Reply