Are Apoths still coaching staff

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
Babs
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 766
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Are Apoths still coaching staff

Post by Babs »

I know, it's crazy that a BBRC members is asking the question.

Under Deathzone - Apoths used to be under the heading 'additional coaching staff' along with wizards. In the LRB that's no longer the case.

Are Apoths still considered coaching staff for the sake of, say, Mickey Finn on the Handicap table?

It appears as though Apoths and Wizards are _not_ considered coaching staff because they are not under the heading 'coaching staff' which talks about Head coaches, cheerleaders and assistant coaches.

Can someone please clarify?

Thanks.

Reason: ''
=-) Babs (crotchety old, washed up has-been)
ex-BBRC member
ex-NAF AUS/NZ Tournament organiser


Make sure you have read the Feudball Novel.
narkotic
Da Collector
Posts: 3760
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm

Post by narkotic »

In my opinion wizards and Apos are still coaching staff. It's a question of odd editing that those are not listed under the caoching staff part (as many others things are in he wrong place or under wrong heading btw).

1) In my understanding everything except the team players are coaching staff.

2) on a side note, if not, then "Mickey Finn" would lose much of it's handicap potential ("oh dear, you lose a cheerleader!")

Reason: ''
User avatar
Dave
Info Ed
Posts: 8090
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:19 am
Location: Riding my Cannondale

Post by Dave »

guess he is a part of coaching staff .. yes.

Reason: ''
Image
'Ed Basha'
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 12:30 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by 'Ed Basha' »

I'd go along with that....anyone on the sidelines in support fo the team is coaching staff.

Reason: ''
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
Babs
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 766
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Is it a change or not?

Post by Babs »

Well, I've been answering the same as you people, figuring that if they're not players then they're coaching staff - but it's not explicit at all under the LRB. Is this how it's going to remain? Can we add it to the hot list for me to discuss? :lol: Very confusing for new players.

Reason: ''
=-) Babs (crotchety old, washed up has-been)
ex-BBRC member
ex-NAF AUS/NZ Tournament organiser


Make sure you have read the Feudball Novel.
User avatar
Dave
Info Ed
Posts: 8090
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2002 8:19 am
Location: Riding my Cannondale

Post by Dave »

make it a FAQ .. everybody happy

Reason: ''
Image
User avatar
DesTroy
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 883
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 2:17 am
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Post by DesTroy »

Do the same for Cheerleaders; even though they are clearly not coaching staff, new players may not know unless the answer is plain, which it will be in a FAQ. You never know... :-?

Reason: ''
---troy
[img]http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p41/DesTroy1968/nba3-1.gif[/img] [b]NBA Novice Heretic[/b]
As renowned bard Bruce Slannstein said, "Blind faith - in anyone or anything - will get your ogre killed."
narkotic
Da Collector
Posts: 3760
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm

Post by narkotic »

I just say "a handover is a type of a very short pass" :D

Reason: ''
'Ed Basha'
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 12:30 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

Post by 'Ed Basha' »

I don't think this would require an entire rewrite or anything babs....a simple faq on who is and isn't considered coaching staff for the purpose of certain special plays or events would be handy though.

Reason: ''
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.

Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool.
Post Reply