Talk Fantasy Football

The other day, I played Valen and whilst using Fezglitch, I managed to plough into my own prone player As he was already prone, we made a straight armour roll, which he survived. However, from here, we were unsure whether that player could take a turn as he:

a) wasn't knocked over by the ball and chain
b) didn't have his armour broken

We decided that he could take a turn. was this correct?

Nope. Getting a player from your own team knocked over is a turnover, unless the rule explicitly mentions that it is not.

Alex said that the player was already down Plasmoid, not knocked down by Fezglitch.

I generally allow the player to take the move with the prone guy (then again, I'm usually doing so badly with my gobbos that my opponents don't object ). But @I would be interested to see the official ruling (there are no ruling specifically against it...)

Id say the prone player could take an action in the next turn, if he was prone & pushed back as part of a "chain pushback" there would be nothing stopping him from taking an action.

I understand that there was an armour roll involved, but as it was passed i dont see a problem..

I play gobbo's so have to agree with the previous post!!

Oops, my mistake.
Yep - he can move then.

Agreed ... nothing happened to him that would prevent him from taking his action.

Its similar to a Stunty landing and being Placed Prone ... he still gets to take an action that turn if he has not yet.

Galak

While at it, since my search-skills obviously leaves alot to be wished for, is this about right:

Cas with chainsaw/stab/bombs = no SPP
Cas with Ball and chain = SPP?

s031720 wrote:Cas with chainsaw/stab/bombs = no SPP
Cas with Ball and chain = SPP?

Correct