Page 1 of 1
MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:24 am
by Anglachel
According to the casualty table in the rulebook:
-1 MA, ST, AG, and AV: Miss next game as above. In addition, record
the characteristic change on the team roster. However, no
characteristic may be reduced by more than 2 points or below a value
of 1. Any injuries that could reduce it further are ignored.
Does it mean that the MNG is also ignored?
In a recent league match, one of my snotlings got -1 ST, and we are not sure if he still must MNG or not.
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:48 am
by DoubleSkulls
Still MNG, you just ignore the stat element of the injury.
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:15 am
by slup
But remember to laugh in your opponents face because of an injury that would have crippled any other player beyond use is just forcing you to miss a snotling for a match.
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:03 pm
by GalakStarscraper
slup wrote:But remember to laugh in your opponents face because of an injury that would have crippled any other player beyond use is just forcing you to miss a snotling for a match.
Definitely!
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:15 pm
by Pestimist
I had that happen to my Snow Troll in my first game of a season, my opponent rolled 57 and i was worried for a second then realized it was -AG and just started laughing
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:25 am
by Digger Goreman
Ag 2 is like the "no-man's land" of BB:
few would consider +40k worth moving up to Ag3, and "suffering" from Ag 2 to Ag 1 is a huge
shrug....
I still carry zombie Bruise Killis on roster at Ag 1... he's never dodged better!
Cause... like... he never dodges....
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:55 am
by Smeborg
+1AG on a Bull Centaur is gold dust (but not as good as +2AG, which I had once
).
I remember the "good old days" of 3rd Ed., when AG increases were mandatory. I can remember a few +1AG Mummies... My son had an AG4 Minotaur...
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:18 am
by Darkson
And that has what to do with the question in hand?
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:30 pm
by Digger Goreman
(Some days one is thankful for the edit function)....
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:04 pm
by Darkson
Digger Goreman wrote:It feeds off of, reinforces and supports Pestimist's succinct contention that -Ag on a 2 Ag player isn't a bad thing....
I was talking about Smeborg's wittering about +1AG on BCs, which has nothing to do with the question of -1AG...
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:15 am
by Digger Goreman
Duh... I am mightily confused....
Apologies and I'll edit....
Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:55 pm
by Smeborg
I was responding to Digger Goreman:
QUOTE
"few would consider +40k worth moving up to Ag3"
UNQUOTE