Page 1 of 1
Q&A in question...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 1:40 pm
by chsic
Hello !
The Bloodbowl 2001 rules review (in GW official website) say that the Q&A of White Dwarf is official.
But:
The printed version of BB 2001 review (in the BB annual 2002) say that all articles, rules or Q&A out before is unofficial.
Who have right ???
Thanks
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 1:57 pm
by GalakStarscraper
The WD is still in use unless a current LRB + last Annual overruled it.
Galak
in fact WD 182
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 2:47 pm
by chsic
Hello,
Precision:
I meant: the Q&A of white dwarf N°182 !
Excuse me...
Chris
Re: in fact WD 182
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 3:16 pm
by Agentrock
chsic wrote:I meant: the Q&A of white dwarf N°182 !
Those clarifications were ones posted for the prior 3rd edition rules before any of the new updates. Some of the Q/As still apply but some do not due to rule changes...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 3:58 pm
by DoubleSkulls
None of WD 182 FAQ still applies. LRB has superceded the lot.
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 4:26 pm
by Agentrock
Yeah, go with the FAQs out on the GW BB site and the rule reviews documentation. This forum is also a good place to look up and ask questions...most people around here don't bite...too hard.
the text in question...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 4:32 pm
by chsic
Precision again:
Here is what is said in 3_BBRC2001Q&A:
2001 BLOOD BOWL RULES REVIEW
PART THREE: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
This section provides answers to important commonly asked questions. This
and the Q&A published in WD 182 are the only Q&A which should be
considered an official addition to the Blood Bowl game. Any other published
Q&A you come across, no matter who wrote it, should be considered unofficial
guidelines, and is overruled by the Q&A in WD 182 and below. We will
republish the WD Q&A in the 2002 Blood Bowl Annual, and they are also
available on the Blood Bowl resources page of the Games Workshop website.
Please note that some answers in the WD182 Q&A have been superseded by
changes made in this rules review. If any contradictions arise the rules review
always takes precedence over the WD182 Q&A.
(....)
My question is:
It is still valid today?
the text in question...
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 4:32 pm
by chsic
Precision again:
Here is what is said in 3_BBRC2001Q&A:
2001 BLOOD BOWL RULES REVIEW
PART THREE: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
This section provides answers to important commonly asked questions. This
and the Q&A published in WD 182 are the only Q&A which should be
considered an official addition to the Blood Bowl game. Any other published
Q&A you come across, no matter who wrote it, should be considered unofficial
guidelines, and is overruled by the Q&A in WD 182 and below. We will
republish the WD Q&A in the 2002 Blood Bowl Annual, and they are also
available on the Blood Bowl resources page of the Games Workshop website.
Please note that some answers in the WD182 Q&A have been superseded by
changes made in this rules review. If any contradictions arise the rules review
always takes precedence over the WD182 Q&A.
(....)
My question is:
It is still valid today?
Thanks
Chris
Posted: Thu May 08, 2003 4:53 pm
by Grumbledook
get the living rulebook and the 2003 annual and then you won't have to worry about anything
tbh if that was published in 2001 i would ignore it ;]