Intecept question

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
sangraal
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:58 am
Location: Sydney - Australia

Intecept question

Post by sangraal »

Hi Guys,

Whilst I am 99% sure of the answer, this little event cost an elf player
a win in the semi-final of our league tourney. --- I want to show him the
answers I get here to ease his mind......

Elf player passes, an Orge is in a position to Intercept & rolls a 6 -- Intercept!!

But the Elf player says that the Orge has to roll bonehead to see if he can
attempt the intercept ---- the other 3 players present say no, Intercept is not an action, same as Catch. ( & its not the Orges turn either, obviously)

Elf player not happy.....

sangraal

Reason: ''
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Post by Grumbledook »

currently the ogre doesn't have to roll bonehead no, its not an action and you only roll bonehead at the start of his action

now whats not currently clear is if he failed the last bonehead roll he made before the intercept

as far as the rules go at the moment he is still allowed to roll for the intercept despite failing the last roll but this should hopefully be cleared up in the rules review next month

from your question though he just rolls the intercept and if he gets the 6 then its an interception

Reason: ''
sangraal
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:58 am
Location: Sydney - Australia

Post by sangraal »

At the time we were all agreed that if he had failed Bonehead the previous
turn he would not have been able to attempt the intercept....

It was like an instant house rule as it had never come up before.

It was a semi-final though, & the Human player had Morg n Thorg in the intercept zone as well --- but he wanted the SPPs for his Orge.

Humans were down 0-2 at half time, came back & won 3-2.....

sangraal

Reason: ''
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Post by GalakStarscraper »

sangraal wrote:At the time we were all agreed that if he had failed Bonehead the previous
turn he would not have been able to attempt the intercept....

It was like an instant house rule as it had never come up before.
Just so you know ... this is a house rule. A player who has failed Bonehead can still catch or intercept the ball per the rules of the game since these items are not actions.

Galak

Reason: ''
User avatar
Lofwyr
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: near Bonn, Germany

Post by Lofwyr »

Which I hope will be changed as soon as possible!

Tobias

Reason: ''
The early bird may get the worm,
but the second mouse gets the cheese!
User avatar
Valen
Walking on the beaches...
Posts: 8665
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:33 pm
Location: Blackburn, Lancashire

Post by Valen »

Yes, I agree, they shouln't really be allowed too intercept if the have boneheaded last turn.

Reason: ''
Image

I'm coming at you with razor blades and lemon juice... I'm talkin' pain, boy. Searing, mind-numbing pain!!!
User avatar
slackman
Experienced
Experienced
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:57 pm
Location: denver, colorado

Post by slackman »

what im really hoping they do is clarify what exactly happens when you lose your tacklezone, or at least what you are able to do specifically when you dont have one. as it stands now "you may still assist blocks but cannot prevent others from assisting" really sounds like something they just pulled out of, erm, the air. i really dont care how everything gets ruled, just as long as they do something about it. ints are pretty bunk anyway, seeing as how nearly everyone needs a 6 i wouldnt mind bgs w/out tzs still being able to do it.

slackman42

Reason: ''
"the worst part is the endless pain and torture that gnaw at my heart like thousands of tiny very evil gnomes. or doves. evil doves." sad robot, www.wearerobots.com
narkotic
Da Collector
Posts: 3760
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm

Post by narkotic »

the same question arises whether an Ogre/Troll has to roll Bonehead for catching bouncing balls or what happens if he lost his TZ before. And bouncing balls are somewhat more common than interceptions, so this issue should be cleared IMO.

Reason: ''
User avatar
DoubleSkulls
Da Admin
Posts: 8219
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Back in the UK
Contact:

Post by DoubleSkulls »

Bonehead just means you lose your TZ. I can understand the confusion with assists, but catching the ball? :roll:

Reason: ''
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
User avatar
Lofwyr
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:04 pm
Location: near Bonn, Germany

Post by Lofwyr »

Yes, but the question is: SHOULD the troll be able to catch a ball if he´s affected by bonehead (or really stupid).
In my opinion this is a NO.

Tobias

Reason: ''
The early bird may get the worm,
but the second mouse gets the cheese!
User avatar
DoubleSkulls
Da Admin
Posts: 8219
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Back in the UK
Contact:

Post by DoubleSkulls »

I would agree that making failed BH/RS rolls more painful is a good idea - but catching balls is a small part of that (especially given the low AG of most BGs).

I'd rather see the rules cleared up so that failed BH/RS rolls mean you can't give assists as, IMO, that would hurt them a lot more and works around the Guard "patch".

Reason: ''
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
Post Reply