Intecept question
Moderator: TFF Mods
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:58 am
- Location: Sydney - Australia
Intecept question
Hi Guys,
Whilst I am 99% sure of the answer, this little event cost an elf player
a win in the semi-final of our league tourney. --- I want to show him the
answers I get here to ease his mind......
Elf player passes, an Orge is in a position to Intercept & rolls a 6 -- Intercept!!
But the Elf player says that the Orge has to roll bonehead to see if he can
attempt the intercept ---- the other 3 players present say no, Intercept is not an action, same as Catch. ( & its not the Orges turn either, obviously)
Elf player not happy.....
sangraal
Whilst I am 99% sure of the answer, this little event cost an elf player
a win in the semi-final of our league tourney. --- I want to show him the
answers I get here to ease his mind......
Elf player passes, an Orge is in a position to Intercept & rolls a 6 -- Intercept!!
But the Elf player says that the Orge has to roll bonehead to see if he can
attempt the intercept ---- the other 3 players present say no, Intercept is not an action, same as Catch. ( & its not the Orges turn either, obviously)
Elf player not happy.....
sangraal
Reason: ''
- Grumbledook
- Boy Band Member
- Posts: 10713
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
- Location: London Town
currently the ogre doesn't have to roll bonehead no, its not an action and you only roll bonehead at the start of his action
now whats not currently clear is if he failed the last bonehead roll he made before the intercept
as far as the rules go at the moment he is still allowed to roll for the intercept despite failing the last roll but this should hopefully be cleared up in the rules review next month
from your question though he just rolls the intercept and if he gets the 6 then its an interception
now whats not currently clear is if he failed the last bonehead roll he made before the intercept
as far as the rules go at the moment he is still allowed to roll for the intercept despite failing the last roll but this should hopefully be cleared up in the rules review next month
from your question though he just rolls the intercept and if he gets the 6 then its an interception
Reason: ''
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:58 am
- Location: Sydney - Australia
At the time we were all agreed that if he had failed Bonehead the previous
turn he would not have been able to attempt the intercept....
It was like an instant house rule as it had never come up before.
It was a semi-final though, & the Human player had Morg n Thorg in the intercept zone as well --- but he wanted the SPPs for his Orge.
Humans were down 0-2 at half time, came back & won 3-2.....
sangraal
turn he would not have been able to attempt the intercept....
It was like an instant house rule as it had never come up before.
It was a semi-final though, & the Human player had Morg n Thorg in the intercept zone as well --- but he wanted the SPPs for his Orge.
Humans were down 0-2 at half time, came back & won 3-2.....
sangraal
Reason: ''
- GalakStarscraper
- Godfather of Blood Bowl
- Posts: 15882
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Location: Indiana, USA
- Contact:
Just so you know ... this is a house rule. A player who has failed Bonehead can still catch or intercept the ball per the rules of the game since these items are not actions.sangraal wrote:At the time we were all agreed that if he had failed Bonehead the previous
turn he would not have been able to attempt the intercept....
It was like an instant house rule as it had never come up before.
Galak
Reason: ''
- Valen
- Walking on the beaches...
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 1:33 pm
- Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
- slackman
- Experienced
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:57 pm
- Location: denver, colorado
what im really hoping they do is clarify what exactly happens when you lose your tacklezone, or at least what you are able to do specifically when you dont have one. as it stands now "you may still assist blocks but cannot prevent others from assisting" really sounds like something they just pulled out of, erm, the air. i really dont care how everything gets ruled, just as long as they do something about it. ints are pretty bunk anyway, seeing as how nearly everyone needs a 6 i wouldnt mind bgs w/out tzs still being able to do it.
slackman42
slackman42
Reason: ''
"the worst part is the endless pain and torture that gnaw at my heart like thousands of tiny very evil gnomes. or doves. evil doves." sad robot, www.wearerobots.com
-
- Da Collector
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm
- DoubleSkulls
- Da Admin
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Back in the UK
- Contact:
- Lofwyr
- Veteran
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2003 4:04 pm
- Location: near Bonn, Germany
- DoubleSkulls
- Da Admin
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Back in the UK
- Contact:
I would agree that making failed BH/RS rolls more painful is a good idea - but catching balls is a small part of that (especially given the low AG of most BGs).
I'd rather see the rules cleared up so that failed BH/RS rolls mean you can't give assists as, IMO, that would hurt them a lot more and works around the Guard "patch".
I'd rather see the rules cleared up so that failed BH/RS rolls mean you can't give assists as, IMO, that would hurt them a lot more and works around the Guard "patch".
Reason: ''
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams