Page 1 of 1
i'm going to try vamps
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 8:26 am
by Magic Dave
ok if i play them with only two vamps would i have more joy?
and does hypno gaze work well as the only guy i know that playes vamps really doesn't use it.
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 9:06 am
by MickeX
Yes. Yes.
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:20 am
by rodders
does this mean you want to borrow my vamps?
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:55 am
by Magic Dave
no thank you.
i'll get my own!
Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 4:13 am
by Skummy
Start with 2 vamps, 5 rerolls. I find a good rule of thumb is to have twice as many rerolls as starting vamps until you get Pro.
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 5:08 pm
by Ravage
2 vamps, 5 RR, and 2 FF? Or did you mean 2 vamps and 4 RR with 9FF?
you could go 5RR, 7FF, and no apo... but I *really* wouldnt recommend starting a vamp team without one
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 5:14 am
by rodders
Ravage wrote:2 vamps, 5 RR, and 2 FF? Or did you mean 2 vamps and 4 RR with 9FF?
you could go 5RR, 7FF, and no apo... but I *really* wouldnt recommend starting a vamp team without one
i would untill your thralls start to get skilled up
id proobably start with 3 vamps i took 4 to the bb last year and found that was too many but think 2 are too few
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 5:57 pm
by Ravage
In LRB4 I would always take the apo. In LRB5 I'm not sure... being able to use the apo on the vamps would be nice, but if you simply rely on regen then I would let the thralls go a while without the apo. With journeymen, the team doesnt have need for permanent thralls until they get skilled so yes, in that case I'd feel comfortable frontloading more vamps.