Dwarves - running game only, or add passing?
- lerchey
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:37 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA - USA
Dwarves - running game only, or add passing?
Hi All,
I've started in a new league (OK, new to me) recently with a Dwarf team. 5 games in they're at 2-0-2 and have 5 players with skills.
Started with 2 Blitzers, 2 Slayers, 1 Runner and 6 Blockers. I've since added a second Blocker and an APO, and after my last game, added the second runner (more MA 6 players won't hurt me!).
My first runner skilled up and took block. I also have 2 blockers with guard, a blitzer with jump up (which I've already found to be quite handy!), and one with dodge (as I also find that I need to periodically dodge out to use blitzes against ball carriers).
The coach I played with this weekend suggested that I develop a Runner into a QB. He showed me a roster from a dwarf team of his with a runner that has (as added skills) pass, accurate, and strong arm.
I've read various playbooks on dwarves, and most of them say to not bother with developing a passer. However, given that he's a 6 3 3 8 player that starts with Sure Hands, what's the harm? Once he gets pass, he's as good as a human thrower (starting), but with Thick Skull (not a game breaker, but useful at times).
Is there any good reason not to develop one runner as a runner and one as a thrower?
Fire away! :)
I've started in a new league (OK, new to me) recently with a Dwarf team. 5 games in they're at 2-0-2 and have 5 players with skills.
Started with 2 Blitzers, 2 Slayers, 1 Runner and 6 Blockers. I've since added a second Blocker and an APO, and after my last game, added the second runner (more MA 6 players won't hurt me!).
My first runner skilled up and took block. I also have 2 blockers with guard, a blitzer with jump up (which I've already found to be quite handy!), and one with dodge (as I also find that I need to periodically dodge out to use blitzes against ball carriers).
The coach I played with this weekend suggested that I develop a Runner into a QB. He showed me a roster from a dwarf team of his with a runner that has (as added skills) pass, accurate, and strong arm.
I've read various playbooks on dwarves, and most of them say to not bother with developing a passer. However, given that he's a 6 3 3 8 player that starts with Sure Hands, what's the harm? Once he gets pass, he's as good as a human thrower (starting), but with Thick Skull (not a game breaker, but useful at times).
Is there any good reason not to develop one runner as a runner and one as a thrower?
Fire away! :)
Reason: ''
-
- Eternal Rookie
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 2:09 am
- Location: Winchester
Passing with dwarfs can be fun but it almost certainly isnt optimal. You compare a human thrower with the dwarf runner which is fair but.... actually most people develop their human throwers into ball runners.
Reason: ''
Victim of the Colonel's car boot smash. First person to use Glynn's bath.
Update: the Hartlepool family Glynn now has a virgin bath.
Barney is a clever dog.
Update: the Hartlepool family Glynn now has a virgin bath.
Barney is a clever dog.
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 1019
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:48 pm
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Dwarves - running game only, or add passing?
It's not that you shouldn't develop a runner into a passer, but rather that you're better off in the beginning to make him a better runner (block and even Kick Off Return too) before bothering with the throwing skills.lerchey wrote:
Is there any good reason not to develop one runner as a runner and one as a thrower?
Simply put, if you need to throw the ball, then you're probably in dire straits to begin with because you couldn't contain the game and play at a dwarf-pace. So the common wisdom is just to look after the basics first before you start freelancing with elf-style play

Reason: ''
Spike! Magazine Major Tournament - September @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
Thunderbowl Sports Network - Head Coach of the Leaps of Faith.
Thunderbowl Sports Network - Head Coach of the Leaps of Faith.
- cyagen
- Star Player
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2004 2:52 pm
- Location: Germany
- lerchey
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:37 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA - USA
Thanks all.
I have a fairly solid running/bashing game going, though opponents have managed to beat me with really fast and dodgy players (an MA 9 human runner was really hard to stop, even deployed in depth!). While my line's tackle-all-over is pretty good at stopping dodges, it's not a full-blown show stopper. And against opposing AV 9 teams (Orcs, for example), it's harder to get the numerical advantage I get against softer foes. :)
All in all, I'm happy with the team and it's progress. I think that based on the recommendations, I'll plan to develop the second runner as a runner and see if any opportunities (AG 4 players, etc.) turn up to make me change my mind.
First game with 2 runners fielded is next weekend. No idea as to what kinds of teams I'll be playing as the league doesn't really schedule games, so much as have a running mass of pick-up games.
Thanks!
I have a fairly solid running/bashing game going, though opponents have managed to beat me with really fast and dodgy players (an MA 9 human runner was really hard to stop, even deployed in depth!). While my line's tackle-all-over is pretty good at stopping dodges, it's not a full-blown show stopper. And against opposing AV 9 teams (Orcs, for example), it's harder to get the numerical advantage I get against softer foes. :)
All in all, I'm happy with the team and it's progress. I think that based on the recommendations, I'll plan to develop the second runner as a runner and see if any opportunities (AG 4 players, etc.) turn up to make me change my mind.
First game with 2 runners fielded is next weekend. No idea as to what kinds of teams I'll be playing as the league doesn't really schedule games, so much as have a running mass of pick-up games.
Thanks!
Reason: ''
- Vesto
- Rookie
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 10:06 pm
- Contact:
Eleven games in our local league and only three passes with my skilled runner, another two fired due injuries. Two passes caught by unguarded troll slayer (MA5 really rocks
). No passing skills but Leader selected out of 5 skill rolls.
My playing style consists in bashing, fouling and walking, most of GFI rolls made my blockers.

My playing style consists in bashing, fouling and walking, most of GFI rolls made my blockers.
Reason: ''
Magic rings are - well, magical; and they are rare and curious.
-
- Da Cynic
- Posts: 7462
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
- Location: Nice Red Uniforms and Fanatical devotion to the Pope!
- Xeterog
- Super Star
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 6:58 am
- Location: Texas, USA
developing the 2nd runner as a passer is not a bad thing at all. Gives you options when the running game bogs down too much. Other teams pass with agility 3 just fine..dwarves can do it, just don't rely on passing..do the running game, but have the option to heave the ball--people might just be caught off guard.
Reason: ''
-Xeterog
- mattgslater
- King of Comedy
- Posts: 7758
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:18 pm
- Location: Far to the west, across the great desert, in the fabled Land of Comedy
A truer statement would be: "MA4 really sucksVesto wrote:MA5 really rocks).

Yeah, it's ok to throw sometimes if you have a TRR and are passing with a guy who can use the SPP, but I'd develop for defense unless I felt that I was out of the range of my competition (either a lot better or a lot worse). If you really stink, you need to build the offense or you'll get scored on, and if you have a good opportunity to build one or two offensive specialists, go right ahead.
But for my money, passing skills on a Runner are in #3 territory. One guy gets Block then Kickoff Return, and at that point starts thinking about Accurate or Pass (the other one goes for Block, then Fend, then Pro or Nerves, depending on what else I have). I also develop Blocker #5 with Grab: he always plays on offense, but only sees the field on defense if there's been an injury.
If you stumble upon an AG4 Runner, that changes everything. Follow with Pass, then Nerves or Accurate. But more important than any of that is that an AG4 Runner or Blitzer catches on a 2. So if you have a TRR, you have a very good shot at a completion with a Blocker. That's huge.
Reason: ''
What is Nuffle's view? Through a window, two-by-three. He peers through snake eyes.
What is Nuffle's lawn? Inches, squares, and tackle zones: Reddened blades of grass.
What is Nuffle's tree? Risk its trunk, space the branches. Touchdowns are its fruit.
What is Nuffle's lawn? Inches, squares, and tackle zones: Reddened blades of grass.
What is Nuffle's tree? Risk its trunk, space the branches. Touchdowns are its fruit.
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:49 am
Nerves of Steel and Dump Off on both runners is actually pretty fun. You can sometimes entice teams to come into the back of your cage and get beaten down for turns upon turns!
But Fend and Block are better choices, IMHO. I also love Kick Off Return and Leader early on (but eventually ditch leader... no real need for an extra re-roll long term.)
But Fend and Block are better choices, IMHO. I also love Kick Off Return and Leader early on (but eventually ditch leader... no real need for an extra re-roll long term.)
Reason: ''
- DoubleSkulls
- Da Admin
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Back in the UK
- Contact:
- lerchey
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:37 am
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA - USA
Just thought I'd provide an update on the team. After 8 games (4W, 2T, 2L) I have two Blockers with Guard, both runners have Block (one has 5 completions and one has 2), one Blitzer has Jump Up - which has been really awesome as I've not failed the +2 AG roll yet! - the other Blitzer has Dodge + a new skill from the last game (normal - I'm considering Stand Firm), and one Troll Slayer has Mighty Blow.
While only a couple of passes have been "necessary" (including one where the ball was in my end zone, I cleared a path for the runner, who ran in and picked it up, then used a GFI to get one space closer to a pack of Blockers on the LoS, threw a Long Pass - rolled a 6, which was caught by a Blocker - rolled a 5, who then, despite not having a chance of getting into the end zone even with GFIs, ran that way anyway 'cause it was fun!), all of them were easy SPPs - essentially hand off actions using a quick pass instead while I had TRRs available.
So, 8 games, won half of them, averaging 1 skill up per game. I'm not unhappy. But until/unless I get someone better at catching, I'll likely stay away from the passing skills. At least for a while. :)
While only a couple of passes have been "necessary" (including one where the ball was in my end zone, I cleared a path for the runner, who ran in and picked it up, then used a GFI to get one space closer to a pack of Blockers on the LoS, threw a Long Pass - rolled a 6, which was caught by a Blocker - rolled a 5, who then, despite not having a chance of getting into the end zone even with GFIs, ran that way anyway 'cause it was fun!), all of them were easy SPPs - essentially hand off actions using a quick pass instead while I had TRRs available.
So, 8 games, won half of them, averaging 1 skill up per game. I'm not unhappy. But until/unless I get someone better at catching, I'll likely stay away from the passing skills. At least for a while. :)
Reason: ''