A piling on 'tweak' ?

Got a great idea and/or proposal for BloodBowl?

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
Ithilkir
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2546
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 10:04 pm
Location: Fife, Scotland
Contact:

A piling on 'tweak' ?

Post by Ithilkir »

Change PO so the player has to choose whether to pile on before the AV roll, then add this to the skill description...

After the infamous Chaos All-Stars/Lowdown Rats match of 2467 where no less than 15 goblin players from the Rats were flattened into pancakes by the All-Stars infamous troll blocker Bork Bulge-Belly, the rules of the game were altered so that "Attacking a fallen opponent" included belly flopping onto them.

If the armour roll comes up a double (1,1 6,6 etc) then the piling on player is sent off, you may argue the call as usual.

Reason: ''
Cheers,
Stephen :: LRB 5.0 Background Editor
Blood Bowl 2005 & 2006 :: Winner of Most Casualties
The Lore of Nuffle :: The webs biggest BB flavour archive!
Redfang
Legend
Legend
Posts: 4503
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 11:18 am
Location: With the wife, watching Zara and the Hasslefree chick from behind their bedroom curtain...

Post by Redfang »

I think that, if there really is a problem with Pile on, it is resolved enough by either one of these amendments.

R

Reason: ''
Ik wou dat ik twee blondjes was,
Dan kon ik samen spelen.

[size=67][url=http://www.talkbloodbowl.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=14334]Bragging[/url][/size]

What keeps me busy nowadays: [url=http://www.bruchius.com/]Fun with violence.[/url]
User avatar
Agentrock
Emerging Star
Emerging Star
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Arlington, Tx ~ USA
Contact:

Re: A piling on 'tweak' ?

Post by Agentrock »

Ithilkir wrote:Change PO so the player has to choose whether to pile on before the AV roll, then add this to the skill description...
We use this method in our league...gaining a possible 3+ on the armor roll should come with some risks (since you have to be prone to gain the benefits). Besides, allowing it to be used after the armor roll takes a bit away from the randomness that people love about BB.

Reason: ''
The end-zone “line of death” does not discriminate when one tempts fate by using a “go for it” to pass over it.
Dangerous Dave
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Surrey

Post by Dangerous Dave »

The only tweak for P On is to move it back to choose before the armour roll.

Then its fine - there is no need to add a sending off chance - if you have this, Piling On will rarely, if ever be taken. Fouls tend to be performed by your average lino - so getting him / her sent off is no big deal. Losing your Norse Blitzer or Mummy IS a big deal - hence the skill will never be taken.


Dave

Reason: ''
User avatar
Balrog
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 694
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2002 3:19 pm
Location: Montreal, Qc

Post by Balrog »

Ack! Another Piling On thread!!!

Changing it back to before the armour roll is the only modification Piling On needs.

-Balrog

Reason: ''
User avatar
zeroalpha
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 6:50 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by zeroalpha »

I think the reason we see so many piling on threads is that there is a real problem with it.
The players that wreak the most havoc with the skill are already throwing two dice blocks at your average player (black orcs, mummies) and so getting two advantages at once.
Personally, as a minimum, it needs to be changed to declaring before the armour dice are rolled. And it really needs more revision than that i think.

Reason: ''
User avatar
Zombie
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2245
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:07 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Post by Zombie »

The guys are right. Change it back to before the roll and it's perfectly fine, no need for anything else.

Reason: ''
Post Reply