A new approach to fouling....

narkotic · Post by **narkotic** » Fri May 16, 2003 1:17 pm

Norse wrote: if he is knocked out then a 6 is required

if he stays on the pitch, then a 4+ needs to be rolled...

You mean the other way 'round, don't you?

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri May 16, 2003 1:27 pm

No....

the guy committing the foul is sent off...

if his victim is unhurt he returns on a 4+

if his victim is knocked out then he returns on a 6 (the victim on a 4+ as always)

if his victim is hurt or worse then he is sent off...

narkotic · Post by **narkotic** » Fri May 16, 2003 1:59 pm

I see, it was meant for the come-back roll, not for the ejecting-roll...

Asperon Thorn · Post by **Asperon Thorn** » Fri May 16, 2003 5:25 pm

I have to agree with Grumble on the 10 yard penalty rule, and for the most part I don't agree with the chance of returning a fouler.

But. . . For the Sake of Fluff and this topic. If you were going to allow different rolls for the severity of injury on a foul then there should also be a fine attached to the foul. In American football, if a player is caught fouling, and even if he isn't ejected the NFL commisioner looks at the play, and determines a fine to the player.

Something like 30K for a Cas

20K for a KO

and 10K for a stun or nothing at all.

Fine only charged if the player is caught. Fines must be paid, and may cause a team to have a negative treasury. (Debt.)

If you are going to give a player a chance to return, there should be at least some sort of permanent affect.

Asperon Thorn