Bloodbowl Odds

Deathwing · Post by **Deathwing** » Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:12 pm

Heh heh.

I suspect they'll be different enough. I didn't take any Ghouls last time out for example..and even if most people go Block on the Mummies after game 1 and 2, they'll diversify from that point on surely.
I'm still undecided what to take myself...

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri Jan 03, 2003 1:42 pm

No Ghouls????

An evil cunning there my friend...

..no weakness in the team at all...

....maybe that is the key to winning 4 games.....

....and still not placing..

Ancalagon · Post by **Ancalagon** » Fri Jan 03, 2003 2:58 pm

Norse wrote: ..no weakness in the team at all...

To do this you must coach dwarves. Maybe I do.

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri Jan 03, 2003 3:20 pm

You don't see an average team movement of M4.4 and only 4 players with an AG greater than 2 as a weakness?

I accept (I love!) the fact that you will probably finish the game with more players than the other guy.. but Dwarves are not tournament material.

The Blood Bowl is a sprint, not a marathon!

Ancalagon · Post by **Ancalagon** » Fri Jan 03, 2003 3:58 pm

Mo6 is not good too. If I'd like to move fast I'd take my lizzies, are faster and stronger than undeads, in fact the only thing that makes undead a good team is luthor.
About having only 4 ball carriers... well, with lizards I have had always only 4 skinks and the results were quite good... but I'm bored of playing lizards. I have the dwarf team and love having block on nearly all my players.

Still not decided.

Grumbledook · Post by **Grumbledook** » Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:03 pm

there is plenty good with undead without luthor

2 mummies st5 means they are strong
ghouls mv7 means they have some speed
zombies 30k means they have expendable troops to hold up strong guys
regenerate means they are hard to outnumber

if you look at almost all the races then they all have their own strengths and weaknesses