2017 feedback
Moderators: lunchmoney, deeferdan, Jimjimjimany, TFF Mods
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 532
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 7:29 am
Re: 2017 feedback
The simple way of avoiding this issue, as already suggested by Purplegoo, is to get rid of the final, with the tourney decided by 6 round of Swiss i.e. the same system as most NAF tourneys. This has the significant plus that it avoids any need for extra time and the potential delay to the end of everyone's gaming weekend.
Reason: ''
- Boneless
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1321
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 11:40 am
Re: 2017 feedback
speedingbullet wrote:The simple way of avoiding this issue, as already suggested by Purplegoo, is to get rid of the final, with the tourney decided by 6 round of Swiss i.e. the same system as most NAF tourneys. This has the significant plus that it avoids any need for extra time and the potential delay to the end of everyone's gaming weekend.
agreed, but also mentioned was that if any event deserves a final its this one, and if it was not removed there would not be a complaint.
even with no final we could still have 2 coaches on 6-0-0 from this year, or a max of 3 coaches on 6-0-0. then how do you award the winner, its the same issue in a different place, thus not solving the problem just moving it
Reason: ''
UK National Co-ordinator for the NAF

Organiser for the Welsh Open
Follow me on http://www.twtich.tv/Hawca_
Organiser for the Welsh Open
Follow me on http://www.twtich.tv/Hawca_
- Garrick
- Super Star
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 2:26 pm
- Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Re: 2017 feedback
I would definitely be in favour of keeping the final!
Now if only I had played better against Jerome in the fifth round then none of this conversation would be happening
Now if only I had played better against Jerome in the fifth round then none of this conversation would be happening

Reason: ''
The artist formerly known as Dipso Gnome.

- PeteW
- Super Star
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 9:58 pm
- Location: Cambridgeshire
Re: 2017 feedback
What about a semi mcmahon system where you seed the field and give the top half a point before R1, and then take it away after r3?
Keep final.
Keep final.
Reason: ''