Wrong skill selection
Moderator: TFF Mods
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:13 pm
Wrong skill selection
Heya. Me and a friend of mine are running a BB league. A player is playing Khemri and we are about 8 games into the league ( only 6 players). For about 4 games ago he gave one of his Mummys Frenzy on a normal skill roll but neither me or my co - commish noticed it but of course now we have. My question is what do we do now?
Does he get to keep the skill even though we know it´s wrong and just put +10k on TV?
Do we replay the games he has had it in?
Just cope with the fact that we have missed it before and remove it now and let him get a normal skill instead?
Is it up to us commishes to decide or is there something written down i the rules about situations like this?
Does he get to keep the skill even though we know it´s wrong and just put +10k on TV?
Do we replay the games he has had it in?
Just cope with the fact that we have missed it before and remove it now and let him get a normal skill instead?
Is it up to us commishes to decide or is there something written down i the rules about situations like this?
Reason: ''
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 1170
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Contact:
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 2:49 am
Only two choices really make sense.
1) Keep the skill and add 10k to the team.
2) Make him change to a skill normally available.
In a really competitive league, I'd choose 1). After all, if three players have played against a Frenzy mummy, then the remaining players should also have to deal with it.
(If the league is ultra-competitive, dock his treasury a small amount for the oversight... no more than 50k.)
In a friendly league, either solution is OK. As a league commish, I'd always go with number 1, personally. At least on the first such offense.
1) Keep the skill and add 10k to the team.
2) Make him change to a skill normally available.
In a really competitive league, I'd choose 1). After all, if three players have played against a Frenzy mummy, then the remaining players should also have to deal with it.
(If the league is ultra-competitive, dock his treasury a small amount for the oversight... no more than 50k.)
In a friendly league, either solution is OK. As a league commish, I'd always go with number 1, personally. At least on the first such offense.
Reason: ''
- Darkson
- Da Spammer
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
- Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
- Contact:
If it's likely to be a mistake, I'd just up the TV, with a warning to be more careful with future skill choices.
If there's a chance it was a deliberate "mistake", I might take a harder line.
If there's a chance it was a deliberate "mistake", I might take a harder line.
Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
- civilian_number_two
- Experienced
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:10 am
- Location: Vancouver
I'd say if he's sure he rolled a regular skill, he should drop it and take a regular skill. The harm is done in the games already played, but there's no sense in piling further mistakes on top of it.
There's only so much you should be blaming on the Commissioner. Coaches ought to know what's legal for their players. Also, if you take the opinion that it was up to the Commssioner to "catch" it, you're setting up a dangerous league dynamic, IMO.
There's only so much you should be blaming on the Commissioner. Coaches ought to know what's legal for their players. Also, if you take the opinion that it was up to the Commssioner to "catch" it, you're setting up a dangerous league dynamic, IMO.
Reason: ''
SPIKE! Magazine Blood Bowl Championship 2011 in Surrey, BC!
http://www.spiketournament.com
http://www.spiketournament.com
-
- Experienced
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 5:54 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:21 am
Or at the very least, adjust the cost as above, and mark the roster so that the next double rolled for any skill is treated as a normal skill (including any 5+5 or 6+6). While it's probable he didn't intend to make the mistake, a glitch like this needs some form of penalty to make others reconsider doing it intentionally.Wylder wrote:Personally, I'd reverse it. Allowing a player to keep an illegal benefit just because no one caught them at it for a couple of games is a very dangerous precedent.
Morgan Vening
Reason: ''
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 6:37 pm
- Location: Frankfurt, Germany
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:18 am
I have to agree here with the majority. In our league we had a player who did this. We added +10 to his mummys cost, and told him the next time he rolled a dbl (including str, mv or armour raise) it would count as his frenzy.
It only became a probelem when another more unscrupulous player, started to give his players a dbl skill, then using the "Oh. I did not realise"
With him we just made him retire the player and docked money.
In all fairness though, Being my leagues commish, I do know it is difficult to keep track of everything going on. My advice to you is to tell your players to know there own teams. If they dont, why should they expect you too.
It only became a probelem when another more unscrupulous player, started to give his players a dbl skill, then using the "Oh. I did not realise"
With him we just made him retire the player and docked money.
In all fairness though, Being my leagues commish, I do know it is difficult to keep track of everything going on. My advice to you is to tell your players to know there own teams. If they dont, why should they expect you too.
Reason: ''