Wait a second: Foul casualties don't count?

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Post by GalakStarscraper »

Draco wrote:Maybe Galak can give more info as how the rule is to be read. Or maybe Grumbledook will do so, instead of only stating that is in the rules. :wink:
:smoking:
The player didn't CAUSE the casualty ... the crowd did. The player pushed the opponent into the crowd, but the rule book is quite clear that it is the crowd that does the deed when it comes to the casualty.

Galak

Reason: ''
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Post by Grumbledook »

he player didn't do an av roll so how can he possable do the casualty, pushing someone doesn't directly cause the cas

Reason: ''
User avatar
Old Man Draco
Monkey Spanker
Posts: 6856
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 10:58 am
Location: Who knows? Then please tell me, I'm lost!:lol:

Post by Old Man Draco »

Grumbledook wrote:he player didn't do an av roll so how can he possable do the casualty, pushing someone doesn't directly cause the cas
I guess, as usual, many of us try to read this rule in to their own advantage. I honestly would have read it as: "The player made a block and as a result the opponent was BH or whatever gives 2 SPP's."
Maybe, just maybe :-? , the word "blocked" in the SPP section on LRB page 39 could be changed by "blocked and knocked over" or "knocked over on the pitch".
Or add: "If a player (not the crowd) kills, etc...
Just a minor change to avoid confusion for people, like me :oops: , who want to (ab)use rules the way they read it! :smoking:

Reason: ''
Stunty King of Lutèce Bowl 2006!:lol:

Owner of a "Deputy Dook Badge"
tik
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 10:11 am

Post by tik »

I'm with Draco on this one. Like in tort cases, one doesn't have to directly cause harm to be liable. There's no doubt that if the player by the boundary was not blocked, there would be no injury. I believe the intent was to exclude fouls and players failing dodge rolls from giving SPP.

Reason: ''
User avatar
wesleytj
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3260
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 3:41 pm
Location: Terre Haute, IN USA
Contact:

Post by wesleytj »

wow, this is taking the concept of "rules lawyer" to the extreme! :)

Reason: ''
____________________________________
Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how great your achievements, or how miserable your failures, there will always be about 1 Billion people in China who won't give a damn.
Post Reply