QUESTIONs of new rules review

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
User avatar
Chapas
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 9:49 am

QUESTIONs of new rules review

Post by Chapas »

2 questions abaut the new rules NOVEMBER 2003

1Q Can add +1 Migthy bowl skill when a player piling on reroll de arm ?


2Q When Wild animal BLITZ he should to roll 4+ to move?


Thanks

Reason: ''
the last Human macho
plasmoid
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5334
Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 8:55 am
Location: Copenhagen
Contact:

Post by plasmoid »

Short version:
Yes you can combine mighty blow and piling on.
You may see the roll before using mighty blow, so you can surely reroll a poor AV roll, and then use mighty blow on your second roll.

And a blitzing WA does have to roll.
Only on a block action are you spared from rolling.

Martin :)

Reason: ''
User avatar
TiMuN
Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
Posts: 1264
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 2:07 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: QUESTIONs of new rules review

Post by TiMuN »

Chapas wrote:2 questions abaut the new rules NOVEMBER 2003

1Q Can add +1 Migthy bowl skill when a player piling on reroll de arm ?

2Q When Wild animal BLITZ he should to roll 4+ to move?

Thanks
Chapas

No se por qué no te pasas por http://www.bloodbowlforo.net y preguntas allí, sabiendo que te podemos informar igual que aqui, pero en cristiano.
(sorry there)

And i fully agree with plasmoid here

You can add mighty blow to the armour roll, and still, reroll it with piling-on. It's not like you are aplying two modifiers to the same roll, like it was before.

And the only thing Wild Animals can do without rolling 4+ is Block another adyacent player. Whatever other action declared, has to roll for 4+
(the other realy stupid racial characteristic)

Reason: ''
[b]TiMuN[/b]
[size=75][img]http://www.bloodbowl.net/NAF/ArticleImages/naf.gif[/img] Member #181
[url=http://www.bloodbowlforo.org]BloodBowlForo.org[/url] | [url=http://spanishteam.tbbl.org]Spanish Team[/url][/size]
User avatar
Chapas
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 9:49 am

??

Post by Chapas »

Yes, but if the WA player not have any player in the takle zone ?
he have to roll 4+ ever?? or BLITZING is a BLOCK?

Very bad WA Review for this players :-). Is it?

Timun (A parte de aprender ingles que ya ves que me viene Bien, tb busco respuestas oficiales de la peña esta del BBIRC, pero Gracias :lol: )

Reason: ''
the last Human macho
User avatar
Asmodan
Legend
Legend
Posts: 4190
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 5:59 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Asmodan »

A blitz is not a block and as it states clearly you have to roll 4+ on anything but a block it means you must roll 4+ to blitz :(

Reason: ''
NUFFLE SUCKS!
Master Heretic
Nuffle Blasphemer´s association
Kheldar
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 708
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:34 am
Location: Darmstadt, Germany

Post by Kheldar »

Now the mino is more a line player then a blitzer.

Reason: ''
Post Reply