Elf pact team

Colin · Post by **Colin** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:05 am

OK so this is a little out there, but I've been playing Disciples II; The Rise of the Elves (Comp game) and I came up with this idea. In the game D2,trote there is a new faction, the Elven Alliance, which is made up of basically High and Wood Elves (though they call them Noble and Wild Elves instead), so I thought maybe this could be an idea for a team. But how would they look like?? Which type of elves would be put in what position?? Or is this just a stupid idea??

Post by **GalakStarscraper** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 3:52 am

Given these type of teams just died a rightful death .... woe to the individual who suggests bringing back this concept from the grave.

Galak

neoliminal · Post by **neoliminal** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 4:07 am

Would make a fine article, IMO.

Skummy · Post by **Skummy** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 5:05 am

At a guess from the way the original pact teams were made, you just take the best player position off of each of the 4 elf teams, right?

0-4 "Pro Elf" Catcher (8 MA, 3 ST, Catch and NOS makes it a natural choice)
0-2 "High Elf" Thrower ('Cos the DE thrower is more expensive)
0-1 "Wood Elf" Treeman (Every pact team needs a big guy!)
0-2 "Dark Elf" Witch Elf (Because the Wood Elf slot was used on the Big Guy...)
1-12 Standard Elves (You know, 6 3 4 8 )

Colin · Post by **Colin** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 6:17 am

GalakStarscraper wrote:Given these type of teams just died a rightful death .... woe to the individual who suggests bringing back this concept from the grave.

Galak

Geez Galak, lighten up! I hated the pact teams as well and glad they are just house rules. This is just a bit of fun and certainly don't expect an elf pact team to be taken seriously. Though you should all try the computer game (if you like turn based strategy).

Xtreme · Post by **Xtreme** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 12:33 pm

I think you should leave the Darkies off the list. They don't play well with the high elves.

Mestari · Post by **Mestari** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 7:03 pm

The pact team concept was as interesting as it was overpowered. May it rest in pieces.

Post by **GalakStarscraper** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 7:38 pm

Torg wrote:Geez Galak, lighten up!

Sorry ...meant to have a smiley face with my comments ...

Galak

MickeX · Post by **MickeX** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 8:14 pm

Mestari wrote:The pact team concept was as interesting as it was overpowered.

Did that sentence really end up the way you wanted it?

Joemanji · Post by **Joemanji** » Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:03 pm

The pact team concept was as interesting as it was overpowered.

Is perfect english. It DOESN'T mean:
The pact team concept was interesting because it was overpowered.

It means:
The amount of interesting-ness was equal to it's overpowered-ness.

However, this is contrary to what M said, so perhaps he didn't mean it quite like that!