rules review errata

[cidervampire]

I think GW should publish a serparate rules review errata/q & a for those poor souls who have the game as published and want to see what the current rules are. Surely this was the whole point of the rules review idea. At the moment their website shows the recent rules review but not the previous one which is also needed to bring owners of the rules in the box up to date. Also to bring an old chestnut back, none of the errata anywhere tells you to ignore the rules about assisting treemen to stand or a necromancer needing to be around in order to use regeneration. I know its been said that the LRB replaces the handbook but the LRB is only half the handbook. As far as I understand, the LRB 1 and the handbook are supposed to be the same ruleset, but as the handbook includes the fluff they are different. Hmmmm

[Skummy]

You're right. That would be a good project for the person who takes over for Andy Hall to begin working on.