human catchers...st 2

bound for glory · Post by **bound for glory** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:07 pm

anyone think maybe the human catchers should be st 3?

Gus · Post by **Gus** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:22 pm

of course. but only after it gets a +30k increase, at least.

sean newboy · Post by **sean newboy** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:35 pm

duff · Post by **duff** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:14 am

If you up the price 20K and drop the move 1 - yeh OK.
I'd sooner see a new position "wide reciver?" the same as a Zon catcher as well as the skinny fast "deep reciver".

McDeth · Post by **McDeth** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:51 am

ST3??, dont you thin k they are already pretty awesome, one skill away from a blodger.

Imagine them with ST 3. One skill away from a 8 Movement ST3 Blodger, they'd be better than a Human Blitzer

kithor2002 · Post by **kithor2002** » Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:01 am

I like the stats of the catcher as they are.

And as McDeth said starting with St3 he will be overpowered.

duff · Post by **duff** » Tue Jan 25, 2005 2:07 am

McDeth wrote: Imagine them with ST 3. One skill away from a 8 Movement ST3 Blodger, they'd be better than a Human Blitzer

... with aromor 7 and agility skills instead of strength. For the same price they would be no better, just different. Making the catchers more powerful would unbalance the team, but the position itself wouldn't be a problem.

bound for glory · Post by **bound for glory** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:47 am

i'm just thinking its a human.not a weedy elf. and only as strong as a goblin?

Gus · Post by **Gus** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:18 am

and as fast as a skink.

kithor2002 · Post by **kithor2002** » Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:55 pm

[quote="bound for glory"]i'm just thinking its a human.not a weedy elf. quote]

And he has not the high Ag and is also cheaper

bound for glory · Post by **bound for glory** » Sun Jan 30, 2005 2:56 am

oi!oi! you guys win. st2 it is

Baron Ollie · Post by **Baron Ollie** » Mon Jan 31, 2005 5:12 pm

Besides, the real stars of the human team are the blitzers... I mean really. Who is more famous - the Running Back or the Wide Receiver? RBs get way more press and attention...

absent1 · Post by **absent1** » Sat Feb 05, 2005 4:00 am

randy moss or ontario smith?

erm

ok
terell owens or some eagles rb

oh, dunno his name even, ok, bad example

i agree wide receivers are never stars like running backs are. and can't possibly be as strong as a quarterback...

ok sorry for the sarcasm

Mattchaos · Post by **Mattchaos** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:01 pm

I think Mc Deth is right, if you had a 8 mv, 3 strength, block tackle player, you'll use it as blitzer instead of real blitzers, like in the High Elves roster no ?

However, for me it's totally not roleplay to have a human (moreover a BB pro) with strength equal to an halfling.

So I really would like to have them +1 St and -1 Mv, for a different cost of course.

Gus · Post by **Gus** » Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:37 pm

well, they are the small, fast runners... in rugby, the smallest, fastest players cannot usually hold in a block against the biggest ones...