Oh god the rules are a mess again!
Moderators: lunchmoney, deeferdan, Jimjimjimany, TFF Mods
- cidervampire
- Experienced
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2001 4:59 pm
Oh god the rules are a mess again!
The rules state you can only use teams from the 2003 review. It then goes on to list the teams but leaves our elf, necro, nurgle and khemri, namely all the teams that were added in the 2003 review and on the registration card there is a tick box section for team choice and there is no option to take these teams. What a mess!!! Not a suprise though!
Reason: ''
afraid nobody around here
understands my potato
guess i'm only a spudboy
looking for a real tomato
understands my potato
guess i'm only a spudboy
looking for a real tomato
- firebreather
- Champion Muppet
- Posts: 1716
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2002 10:09 am
- Location: Lancaster, UK
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 7:10 pm
- Location: Bracknell, Berks
- Contact:
- Torpor
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 5:56 pm
- Location: Godalming, Surrey
It's a GW event. If they didn't give us extra value in something to complain about in the rules pack, what would we do with our time?
Am just hoping that the 'comedy night' in Bugmans isn't repeated... All we need when trying to catch up with people that we haven't seen in months is some halfwit attempting to do stand up.

Am just hoping that the 'comedy night' in Bugmans isn't repeated... All we need when trying to catch up with people that we haven't seen in months is some halfwit attempting to do stand up.
Reason: ''
Helping other players' rankings since 2004...
- DoubleSkulls
- Da Admin
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Back in the UK
- Contact:
-
- The Voice of Reason
- Posts: 6449
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
- Contact:
-
- Eurobowl Superstar
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
- Location: ECBBL, London
The "system"is fine.
There is confusion over teams available. When listed, you only get the 15 from BB, DZ and Lizzies, Norse and Amazons. Elsewhere it states that the LRB 3 is used (which should obviously include Elves, Nurgle, Necro and Khemri). I'd imagine that all Official Teams should be usable (otherwise why are they official) so they just need to clarify Ogre and Vamp use as well.
The only other clarification needed is possibly Star Player use. It's listed as doubling of cost, but we all know that effectively ends any use of them (a loud cheer from certain sections of the community). The 2004 Rules Review Cost IMO is a better judge of cost but I'm happy either way.
As far as points, aside from painting and sportsmanship, you get 13 for winning by 2 or more, 11 for winning by one, 8 for drawing, 5 for losing by one, 3 for getting stuffed. This will ensure that only winners of all games are in contention for the title (rather than a few big wins and a couple of draws maybe) but that you also get more credit for a comfortable win. I think that's quite sensible.
Having said that, in both of the two Bloodbowls (and despite the vast numbers involved and different scoring sets), only three people have won all their matches up to round five, and only one has won all six of their games. So you could argue that the points aren't really that decisive, as long as you reward the win.
There is confusion over teams available. When listed, you only get the 15 from BB, DZ and Lizzies, Norse and Amazons. Elsewhere it states that the LRB 3 is used (which should obviously include Elves, Nurgle, Necro and Khemri). I'd imagine that all Official Teams should be usable (otherwise why are they official) so they just need to clarify Ogre and Vamp use as well.
The only other clarification needed is possibly Star Player use. It's listed as doubling of cost, but we all know that effectively ends any use of them (a loud cheer from certain sections of the community). The 2004 Rules Review Cost IMO is a better judge of cost but I'm happy either way.
As far as points, aside from painting and sportsmanship, you get 13 for winning by 2 or more, 11 for winning by one, 8 for drawing, 5 for losing by one, 3 for getting stuffed. This will ensure that only winners of all games are in contention for the title (rather than a few big wins and a couple of draws maybe) but that you also get more credit for a comfortable win. I think that's quite sensible.
Having said that, in both of the two Bloodbowls (and despite the vast numbers involved and different scoring sets), only three people have won all their matches up to round five, and only one has won all six of their games. So you could argue that the points aren't really that decisive, as long as you reward the win.
Reason: ''
Geggster
Before you criticise someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when they find out, you're a mile away...... and you have their shoes.
Before you criticise someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when they find out, you're a mile away...... and you have their shoes.
- TLAXTLAN CARNISAURS
- Rookie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 5:46 pm
- Location: on the BB pitch racking up the cas count
- Contact:
I've had a rant at the GW events team this morning saying that there are 4 official new teams released last year ( rotter's, vamps, pro elf and ogre ) so whats the ruling on using the products we all bought from GW to use in a GW event and the answer i got was.
"There was a bit of confusion when the rules pack went to print, and I'll have to double check the ogre team but all the others will be fine. We will be putting some clarification on the website soon."
So there you have from the horses mouth GW organisational skills on top again "well done" (sarky tone there methinks)
my vamps WILL be comming with me.
as will some 7s pitches for night time frivality
"There was a bit of confusion when the rules pack went to print, and I'll have to double check the ogre team but all the others will be fine. We will be putting some clarification on the website soon."



So there you have from the horses mouth GW organisational skills on top again "well done" (sarky tone there methinks)

as will some 7s pitches for night time frivality

Reason: ''
we are all worms, i think i'm a glo-worm
- Iron Tom Foundry
- Rookie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:19 pm
- Location: UK
- hoomin_erra
- Leek chewing thread Necromancer
- Posts: 5378
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 7:59 am
- Location: Tossing my caber on the shores of Loch Lomond
- Contact:
- TLAXTLAN CARNISAURS
- Rookie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 5:46 pm
- Location: on the BB pitch racking up the cas count
- Contact:
yes we can use nurgles, vamps and pro elf for deffinate.Iron Tom Foundry wrote:Does this mean we can use Nurgles et al?
How will this work? Will GW send out a second entry form?
ARGGGH!
Can't cope with this confusion....I'll take my Dwarves again
We will have to keep checking the bb site for updates.
(don't take dwarves you can't be that boring)
Reason: ''
we are all worms, i think i'm a glo-worm
- Myrmedon
- Experienced
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 4:13 pm
- Location: Colchester
-
- Super Star
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 7:10 pm
- Location: Bracknell, Berks
- Contact:
I'm sure it is just an error that RR04 isn't the set of rules in the rules pack. I expect everything to be current at the BB, would be daft in the extreme if they weren't
case of Events not talking to SG enough
case of Events not talking to SG enough
Reason: ''
[size=150][color=#FF3333][b]Hag Graef Dragons[/b][/color][/size] [size=117]1st UK :wink: NAF Dark Elf Coach[/size]
[size=150][color=#FF3333][b]Silvania Suckers[/b][/color][/size] [size=117]Most experienced :wink: NAF Vampire Coach[/size]
[size=150][color=#FF3333][b]Silvania Suckers[/b][/color][/size] [size=117]Most experienced :wink: NAF Vampire Coach[/size]