Suggestion: New Thread for TR100 rosters under LRB4

Ravage · Post by **Ravage** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:43 pm

The old thread is all well and good, but given the new LRB and the fact that the old thread A)hasnt been officially updated since January of 2004 and B)is so long it's really not very useful, mostly due to the aforementioned A).......

I think the concept is a fantastic idea, but should be revived and redone for the current playing environment. I know most of the old rosters still work in LRB4, but many of them wont anymore due to price differences, or may not be preferable due to skill changes, etc....

Anyone else agree?

Joemanji · Post by **Joemanji** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:47 pm

Another option would be for us to identify those teams that have changed since LRB 4.0, and produce replacement rosters for those teams. The majority of teams have not changed, and so their rosters can be carried over.

Ravage · Post by **Ravage** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:31 pm

Well CD's & Undead have had direct changes to their rosters (RR price change and mummy price change, respectively) and Ogres/Vamps have been made official.... heck, the old thread even has necro/nurgle/khemri listed as "unofficial" teams so the official rosters may have changed since the pre-LRB3 days when the thread was apparently created.

Also, BH and RS both have red text (dont recall if those were actual changes or just verbage alterations) and Take Root has been changed, so teams that employ BG's who have those skills should probably be looked at as well.

So I guess......

Chaos Dwarf (RR price change)
Halfling (Take Root change affects trees)
Khemri (Not sure of changes since pre-LRB3)
Lizardman (possible BH change to Krox? Unsure)
Necromantic (Not sure of changes since pre-LRB3)
Nurgle (Not sure of changes since pre-LRB3)
Ogre (Not sure of changes since pre-LRB3)
Skaven (Changes made to Rat Ogre)
Undead (Mummy price change)
Wood Elf (Take Root change affects trees)
Vampire (Not sure of changes since pre-LRB3)

would be my preliminary list for others more familiar with how the rules have changed in the past two revisions whether the suggested TR100 rosters in the other thread hold any merit anymore.