i'm going to try vamps

Magic Dave · Post by **Magic Dave** » Thu May 11, 2006 8:26 am

ok if i play them with only two vamps would i have more joy?

and does hypno gaze work well as the only guy i know that playes vamps really doesn't use it.

MickeX · Post by **MickeX** » Thu May 11, 2006 9:06 am

Yes. Yes.

rodders · Post by **rodders** » Thu May 11, 2006 11:20 am

does this mean you want to borrow my vamps?

Magic Dave · Post by **Magic Dave** » Thu May 11, 2006 11:55 am

no thank you.

i'll get my own!

Skummy · Post by **Skummy** » Sat May 13, 2006 4:13 am

Start with 2 vamps, 5 rerolls. I find a good rule of thumb is to have twice as many rerolls as starting vamps until you get Pro.

Ravage · Post by **Ravage** » Tue May 23, 2006 5:08 pm

2 vamps, 5 RR, and 2 FF? Or did you mean 2 vamps and 4 RR with 9FF?

you could go 5RR, 7FF, and no apo... but I *really* wouldnt recommend starting a vamp team without one

rodders · Post by **rodders** » Wed May 24, 2006 5:14 am

Ravage wrote:2 vamps, 5 RR, and 2 FF? Or did you mean 2 vamps and 4 RR with 9FF?

you could go 5RR, 7FF, and no apo... but I *really* wouldnt recommend starting a vamp team without one

i would untill your thralls start to get skilled up

id proobably start with 3 vamps i took 4 to the bb last year and found that was too many but think 2 are too few

Ravage · Post by **Ravage** » Wed May 24, 2006 5:57 pm

In LRB4 I would always take the apo. In LRB5 I'm not sure... being able to use the apo on the vamps would be nice, but if you simply rely on regen then I would let the thralls go a while without the apo. With journeymen, the team doesnt have need for permanent thralls until they get skilled so yes, in that case I'd feel comfortable frontloading more vamps.