Ball & Chain with Multiple Block (or Leap)

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply
Podfrey
Bum Monkey
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 2:26 pm
Location: Camped in your Endzone, toasting marshmallows
Contact:

Ball & Chain with Multiple Block (or Leap)

Post by Podfrey »

Trawled through and can't see it anywhere else:

1) Can a Ball & Chain use Multiple Block against a second player if, by moving, it will make a block against one player?
1.1) If you can, are you also free to decide (within the usual limitations, i.e. the oppo player being next to the blocker) which oppo to Multiple Block?

2) Can you Leap with a Ball & Chain?
2.1) If so, how do you determine where it lands?
2.2) Does it Leap 2 squares or only 1? :o :-?

Cheers,

Geoff

Reason: ''
Image
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Ball & Chain with Multiple Block (or Leap)

Post by GalakStarscraper »

lucifer wrote:1) Can a Ball & Chain use Multiple Block against a second player if, by moving, it will make a block against one player?
1.1) If you can, are you also free to decide (within the usual limitations, i.e. the oppo player being next to the blocker) which oppo to Multiple Block?
A Ball & Chain player cannot use Multiple Block because he is taking a Move Action and not a Block Action. Thus Multiple Block cannot be used.
2) Can you Leap with a Ball & Chain?
Currently yes ... but only because we (myself and the playtesters) missed it from the list of disallowed skills. Leap was an oversite and the BBRC has already agreed to add it to the list of skills that B&C cannot use for LRB 6.0.

So you can either house rule to deal with that OR you could allow the opponent to use Leap once during the movment after seeing the random direction he is going in and if the Leap would take him into an empty square (2 squares of movement would be used).

Galak

Reason: ''
Impact! - Fantasy Football miniatures and supplies designed by gamers for gamers
Image
Podfrey
Bum Monkey
Posts: 2529
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 2:26 pm
Location: Camped in your Endzone, toasting marshmallows
Contact:

Re: Ball & Chain with Multiple Block (or Leap)

Post by Podfrey »

GalakStarscraper wrote:
lucifer wrote:1) Can a Ball & Chain use Multiple Block against a second player if, by moving, it will make a block against one player?
1.1) If you can, are you also free to decide (within the usual limitations, i.e. the oppo player being next to the blocker) which oppo to Multiple Block?
A Ball & Chain player cannot use Multiple Block because he is taking a Move Action and not a Block Action. Thus Multiple Block cannot be used.

Galak
Cheers on the 2nd point.

On the first, the rules state:
...If during his Move Action he would move into an occupied square then the player will throw a block following normal blocking rules against whoever is in that square....
It's a bit confusing that "throw a block following normal blocking rules" is not a "Block Action" but in fact a "Move Action", leading to the slightly spurious situation here (but after several re-reads and cross referencing I eventually see where you're coming from). Can I request that Multiple Block be added to the list of disallowed skills for Ball & Chain (so that it's 100% clear). Ta.

Reason: ''
Image
Duke Jan
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2741
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Watching the great unclean armpits of a Beast Of Nurgle
Contact:

Post by Duke Jan »

Isn't leap covered by
LRB 5| wrote:Making a leap costs the player two squares of movement.
?

Since a ball and chain says:
LRB 5 wrote: To move or Go For It, place the throw-in template over the player facing up or down the pitch or towards either sideline. Then roll a D6 and move the player one square in the indicated direction; no Dodge roll is required if you leave a tackle zone.
So theoretically you could leap to an adjacent square, but it would require an AG roll: while without leap you can simply go there ignoring TZs. Does the rulebook really need to counter this. You could try to consume an extra movement of course, but would anyone really give a B&C leap to achieve this?

Reason: ''
Image

Nuffle Sucks!
User avatar
Old Man Draco
Monkey Spanker
Posts: 6856
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 10:58 am
Location: Who knows? Then please tell me, I'm lost!:lol:

Post by Old Man Draco »

About the Multiple Block thing. I know it might not be 100% the same, but you can't use Multiple Block on a blitz either. Seeing as the B&C is moving before making a block, it would be strange if he would get the exception to be able to use Multiple block.

Reason: ''
Stunty King of Lutèce Bowl 2006!:lol:

Owner of a "Deputy Dook Badge"
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Post by GalakStarscraper »

Duke Jan wrote:Isn't leap covered by
LRB 5| wrote:Making a leap costs the player two squares of movement.
?
You are probably correct with this Duke Jan ... but I have to admit that the rules try to address that folks will really try and drive through when things are not spelled out. I agree that a strong case could be made that the movement rules for the B&C disallow Leap except to an adjacent square but that the average player won't make that mental connection. While we cannot spell out every rule in vast detail ... this one we plan on spelling out (B&C cannot use Leap) because I've had a lot of folks read the rules and think they could still rather than draw upon the more correct reading as you have made.

Galak

Reason: ''
Impact! - Fantasy Football miniatures and supplies designed by gamers for gamers
Image
Duke Jan
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2741
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Watching the great unclean armpits of a Beast Of Nurgle
Contact:

Post by Duke Jan »

It is allowed, it's just a waste of the skill. Sure, take leap on your ball & chain guy and make unnecessary dice rolls if you want to. Why waste words on banning something that is very poor coaching in the first place? Because of the guys trying to win wooden spoons by playing self-destruct gobbos at tournaments?

Reason: ''
Image

Nuffle Sucks!
Post Reply