Just wondering where Bretonians went

plasmoid · Post by **plasmoid** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:35 pm

Rodders said:

They're too busy chasing the Grail to lower themselve to play BB

Indeed - which ties in perfectly with the fluff for the BB team:
http://www.plasmoids.dk/bbowl/BBBretonnians.htm

plasmoid · Post by **plasmoid** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:37 pm

Digger.
That's an unusually nasty attitude, considering that Kk has not been in any of the previous Bretonnian threads.

kk · Post by kk » Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:55 pm

Hey no worries! I perfectly understand that Bretonnians won't make it to LRB6.

I do not want to belong to any camp except rational game development. As the time passes into the future (be it months, years, decades...) I do not think that it is a main game design principle that Bretonnians should be out, but everything else can be added or changed. To be honest I do not know how the supreme power in BB rules development is used, but I suppose that it is JJ who makes the final call. Even as he has decided (several?) years ago that he doesn't like Bretonnians he could change his mind some day. Or GW decides to sculpt Bretonnian team. So should some new teams be added to the game one day, I cannot see why Bretonnians couldn't be considered too and weighted against pro's and cons just like all other possible additions. This consideration could still leave Bretonnians out though.

So do we have any other new team prospects that we can bash (or promote) then?

Darkson · Post by **Darkson** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:50 pm

[editted for truth]

kk wrote:Or GW decides to sculpt Blood Bowl team(s).

Funniest post you've made.

kk wrote:So do we have any other new team prospects that we can bash (or promote) then?

Well, Joe has got a Superman team kicking about somewhere: 8/8/8/10 GASP 30k for linemen last time I looked.

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:17 pm

plasmoid wrote:Digger.
That's an unusually nasty attitude, considering that Kk has not been in any of the previous Bretonnian threads.

Eh?! Not directed towards him...

That's why "bretonnians" is below the foot....

Sorry, Kk, if you took it that way....

kk · Post by kk » Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:44 pm

I wasn't thinking myself being under the foot so no problem at all!

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:06 pm

Cool... I just realized that the Austin Powers II reference was... well... un-referenced....

Be assured, I only wish that fate on the seemingly never-ending... constantly re-surfacing, Brettonians....

Thanks for being a sport!