MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Anglachel · Post by **Anglachel** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:24 am

According to the casualty table in the rulebook:

-1 MA, ST, AG, and AV: Miss next game as above. In addition, record
the characteristic change on the team roster. However, no
characteristic may be reduced by more than 2 points or below a value
of 1. Any injuries that could reduce it further are ignored.

Does it mean that the MNG is also ignored?

In a recent league match, one of my snotlings got -1 ST, and we are not sure if he still must MNG or not.

Post by **DoubleSkulls** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 9:48 am

Still MNG, you just ignore the stat element of the injury.

slup · Post by **slup** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:15 am

But remember to laugh in your opponents face because of an injury that would have crippled any other player beyond use is just forcing you to miss a snotling for a match.

Post by **GalakStarscraper** » Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:03 pm

slup wrote:But remember to laugh in your opponents face because of an injury that would have crippled any other player beyond use is just forcing you to miss a snotling for a match.

Definitely!

Pestimist · Post by **Pestimist** » Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:15 pm

I had that happen to my Snow Troll in my first game of a season, my opponent rolled 57 and i was worried for a second then realized it was -AG and just started laughing

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:25 am

Ag 2 is like the "no-man's land" of BB: few would consider +40k worth moving up to Ag3, and "suffering" from Ag 2 to Ag 1 is a huge shrug....

I still carry zombie Bruise Killis on roster at Ag 1... he's never dodged better!

Cause... like... he never dodges....

Smeborg · Post by **Smeborg** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:55 am

+1AG on a Bull Centaur is gold dust (but not as good as +2AG, which I had once

).

I remember the "good old days" of 3rd Ed., when AG increases were mandatory. I can remember a few +1AG Mummies... My son had an AG4 Minotaur...

Darkson · Post by **Darkson** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:18 am

And that has what to do with the question in hand?

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:30 pm

(Some days one is thankful for the edit function)....

Darkson · Post by **Darkson** » Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:04 pm

Digger Goreman wrote:It feeds off of, reinforces and supports Pestimist's succinct contention that -Ag on a 2 Ag player isn't a bad thing....

I was talking about Smeborg's wittering about +1AG on BCs, which has nothing to do with the question of -1AG...

Digger Goreman · Post by **Digger Goreman** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:15 am

Duh... I am mightily confused....

Apologies and I'll edit....

Smeborg · Post by **Smeborg** » Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:55 pm

I was responding to Digger Goreman:

QUOTE

"few would consider +40k worth moving up to Ag3"

UNQUOTE

Talk Fantasy Football

MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1

Re: MNG and characteristic reduction below 1