Intentionally going below 11 players
Moderator: TFF Mods
-
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:18 pm
- Location: VA
Intentionally going below 11 players
Is there any rule which prohibits releasing players so that you have fewer than 11?
Reason: ''
- Digger Goreman
- Legend
- Posts: 5000
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:30 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA., USA: Recruiting the Walking Dead for the Blood Bowl Zombie Nation
- Contact:
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
You must field 11, journeymen, mercs and stars included....
This is how the timmys use elves for maximum brokenness....
3 J-elves and 8 spp maxxed positionals....
This is how the timmys use elves for maximum brokenness....
3 J-elves and 8 spp maxxed positionals....
Reason: ''
LRB6/Icepelt Edition: Ah!, when Blood Bowl made sense....
"1 in 36, my Nuffled arse!"
"1 in 36, my Nuffled arse!"
- burgun824
- Legend
- Posts: 2274
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: Nashville, TN
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
If you mean intentionally taking j-men, no. I don't believe there is.
Reason: ''
- Darkson
- Da Spammer
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
- Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
- Contact:
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
Incorrect. Apart from when you initially start the team there is no requirement to have 11 players. Journeymen are optional.Digger Goreman wrote:You must field 11, journeymen, mercs and stars included....
Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
- Rolex
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:24 pm
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
True.Darkson wrote:Incorrect. Apart from when you initially start the team there is no requirement to have 11 players. Journeymen are optional.Digger Goreman wrote:You must field 11, journeymen, mercs and stars included....
Anyway going below 11 (both with j-men and not) is not a tactic that works well outside matchmaking.
And matchmaking is not the game, but just a distorted version.
That, being distorted, doesn't work very well.
Reason: ''
- el Superbeasto
- Super Star
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:33 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
- Contact:
Sv: Intentionally going below 11 players
What? :?Darkson wrote: Incorrect. Apart from when you initially start the team there is no requirement to have 11 players. Journeymen are optional.
Reason: ''
My sales thread:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
- Rolex
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:24 pm
Re: Sv: Intentionally going below 11 players
"If a team can only field 10 or less players for the next match, the team may bring Journeymen onto the roster..."el Superbeasto wrote:What? :?Darkson wrote: Incorrect. Apart from when you initially start the team there is no requirement to have 11 players. Journeymen are optional.
Reason: ''
- el Superbeasto
- Super Star
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:33 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
- Contact:
Sv: Intentionally going below 11 players
Ah, sorry! I misread Darkson and overlooked the "apart from". (It's early in Denmark...) My bad. Thanks for clarifying!Rolex wrote:"If a team can only field 10 or less players for the next match, the team may bring Journeymen onto the roster..."el Superbeasto wrote:What? :?Darkson wrote: Incorrect. Apart from when you initially start the team there is no requirement to have 11 players. Journeymen are optional.

Reason: ''
My sales thread:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
- Tritex
- Legend
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Stafford, UK
- Contact:
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
I cannot see much benefit in playing a game without fielding as many players as you can unless you are facing a real bad-ass bashy team that's going to damage your players but even then you can spend the game running away like scared elves he he. But I agree your not forced to. Of course you have to field as many regular players as you have.
Reason: ''
Blood Bowl .. Live to play and play to live! Check out now:
www.tritex-games.co.uk
www.tritex-games.co.uk
www.tritex-games.co.uk
www.tritex-games.co.uk
- Rolex
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:24 pm
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
There is one situation in which I would do it.Tritex wrote:I cannot see much benefit in playing a game without fielding as many players as you can unless you are facing a real bad-ass bashy team that's going to damage your players but even then you can spend the game running away like scared elves he he. But I agree your not forced to. Of course you have to field as many regular players as you have.
With some teams I would prefer to play with 10 players against a team with no wizard then with 11 against the wizard.
Reason: ''
- el Superbeasto
- Super Star
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:33 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
- Contact:
Sv: Intentionally going below 11 players
You get more inducements and may thus be able to hire a star player.Tritex wrote:I cannot see much benefit in playing a game without fielding as many players as you can unless you are facing a real bad-ass bashy team that's going to damage your players but even then you can spend the game running away like scared elves he he. But I agree your not forced to. Of course you have to field as many regular players as you have.
Reason: ''
My sales thread:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
- Tritex
- Legend
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:43 pm
- Location: Stafford, UK
- Contact:
Re: Sv: Intentionally going below 11 players
Ahh I thought he was talking about bring them onto the field. Maybe that's where I am confused in leagues I have played in we always brought the whole team in the reserved box every game.el Superbeasto wrote:You get more inducements and may thus be able to hire a star player.Tritex wrote:I cannot see much benefit in playing a game without fielding as many players as you can unless you are facing a real bad-ass bashy team that's going to damage your players but even then you can spend the game running away like scared elves he he. But I agree your not forced to. Of course you have to field as many regular players as you have.
Reason: ''
Blood Bowl .. Live to play and play to live! Check out now:
www.tritex-games.co.uk
www.tritex-games.co.uk
www.tritex-games.co.uk
www.tritex-games.co.uk
- el Superbeasto
- Super Star
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:33 pm
- Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
- Contact:
Re: Sv: Intentionally going below 11 players
Which is correct. If you can(!) field 11 players, you must(!) do so - which can be a real bugger when you have a secret weapon on the sideline.Tritex wrote:Ahh I thought he was talking about bring them onto the field. Maybe that's where I am confused in leagues I have played in we always brought the whole team in the reserved box every game.el Superbeasto wrote:You get more inducements and may thus be able to hire a star player.Tritex wrote:I cannot see much benefit in playing a game without fielding as many players as you can unless you are facing a real bad-ass bashy team that's going to damage your players but even then you can spend the game running away like scared elves he he. But I agree your not forced to. Of course you have to field as many regular players as you have.

Reason: ''
My sales thread:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=42857
-
- Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:18 pm
- Location: VA
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
Thanks. It came up during discussion of our league's salary cap, but I don't think anyone is really looking to try it out on purpose.
Reason: ''
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2035
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 1:18 pm
- Location: London, England
Re: Intentionally going below 11 players
There are times I wouldn't take a journeyman to afford a better star.
Reason: ''