Vampire Bloodlust & Scoring

[Waldorf28]

Ok I gets ya! Essentially declaring a block on the target outside the endzone as part of the Blitz action would be illegal and the block would not occur, then the TD would be scored.

[dode74]

So you could declare the blitz but could not block at all?

[el Superbeasto]

I suspect that Frenzy follow-up is not considered a "voluntary" move and that the "must end" bit from p. 15 does not apply.

This is a tricky one but if I was ruling on it from a tournament. I would rule that throwing the first block of the blitz was something that would cause a Voluntary chain of events that would cause the player to leave the end zone and as such the throwing of the block was not allowed.

Sorry - can't help myself.
What if the blitz is made from outside the endzone, but the player, on whom the blitz is declared - and who is in the endzone - has side-step. First roll is a push-back, and the player with side-step jumps out of the endzone. Would you then have to follow up with a second block and, thus, risk leaving the endzone? Or would you still rule the blitz as not allowed since it had the potential to cause a Voluntary chain of events that would cause the player to leave the end zone?

[GalakStarscraper]

In the case you described ... I would allow it since it was the opponent that allowed him to not score.

Tom

[Jas1279]

So, is it legal for a blitzing player in an identical situation who does *not* have frenzy skill to throw a block from within the endzone onto a player stood outside the endzone?

[Waldorf28]

I would expect yes throw the block, but you can't follow up and must score.