Regash wrote:I really think this will be a technology for the industry but not for home use.
Not will, but has been for some years already. What the jury is still thinking about is if it will ever manage to work in mass production (or just as one of the first steps). Maybe yes, maybe only for limited cases.
rolo wrote:My dad has a great antique chess set, which is missing a pawn. In a few years I'll be able to just print a new one.
You can probably do it now. Ever heard of silicone moulds?
Have you ever gone to a hardware store with a broken piece of junk, trying what feels like ten thousand different screw sizes until you find the one that fits? I have, and the only thought going through my head (besides a lot of swearing) was, "what a dumb waste of time!". I want to look up what I need, download a 3d design for that screw, print it out, and be finished.
You need to figure how the part is, no matter if you want to make a new one or to find one in a big supplier. If you want to order 1000, a big supplier will be helpful and fast. It happens with electronic parts. If you provide the exact model they will probably be ok with just 1 too, but if you ask them to figure it, not so much for just that one. Once you have figured, does it matter if you print or get one from a supplier? Maybe not, maybe yes because printing can give you the shape but not the mechanical properties. Figuring was required anyway.
BTW, there are many other methods to get things, like CNC or the above mentioned moulds. And in all cases it's about knowing they exist, what they can do and if it's worth it.
Has nobody mentioned that Questron could offer to brands, instead of players? He seems to have long experience, but also very narrow as he jumped into this without knowing how much it would cost to just print. So "pay" or "get paid", but third party handling in any case.