Man, that hurt meMilo wrote:I can understand why you'd want to remove Loner. That would have made Goblins a much better roster. But that wasn't our intent.





Moderator: TFF Mods
Man, that hurt meMilo wrote:I can understand why you'd want to remove Loner. That would have made Goblins a much better roster. But that wasn't our intent.
I think that's the job of tournament organizers, if they want to hold an event where every team has an equal chance of winning. From what I've seen, most tournaments do at least a decent job of this.dreamscreator wrote: First said that I love play with goblins. And what I want is more balance between ALL teams. How many NAF tournaments has been win by stunty teams, or even Vampires, Underworld, Chaos Pact, etc. Would be easy try to balance all the teams a bit more with a small changes or with new positional.
I'm not trying to take anything personally. It's good feedback, from a competitive perspective. I agree that the 'Ooligan doesn't make the team significantly better in a tournament or seriously competitive league. Maybe it would even hurt them. (Although the first game where you get a +3 on the Pitch Invasion rolls may change your mind.) I just dispute that this is the only way to play the Goblins.garion wrote:Yeah that's fair. I'm just trying to be honest and give constructive feedback. If there are great things in the new book I will also be the first to say. Its nothing personal
I agree with your design theories. you are making changes that should be fun and that do not rock the boat. This is very sensible. Narrowing tiers type game design would go down very very badly i agree 100% with your design intentions.
Hooligan just reads as pointless which is a shame is all. As I said before its not a huge problem, just missed opportunity to bring something fun to the team. Sighting taking pass block as a good example of how to use the player though is more than a bit daft. That anyone would pay 20k for pass block in a gobo team is a nonsense really. It also should not be recommended as its very poor advice.
I said some coaches would enjoy it. It could be fun. And that's because Goblins are not generally considered a competitive team. Many coaches play them because the enjoy the background. Some coaches play them because they enjoy the opportunities to model and customize an interesting team. Other coaches play them because they just need a break from competitive play and would enjoy a bit of a lark. If the rules can support those players also, without hurting the Goblins' standing in competitive play, is that such a bad thing? I don't think so.Milo wrote:Yet I think some coaches would enjoy having a Pass Blocking Disturbing Presence with Dodge and Stunty, now only 6 SPPs away.
Actually, Pippi was a Grashnak clone back in the early 3rd Edition days of BB. He didn't have loner, but his coach also didn't have any remaining rerolls. He should have known better than to make that 3-die Blitz.frogboy wrote:Who's Pippi Goblinlayer, and does he ave loner?
All I can say is that it didn't fit the concept of the player being designed. We weren't out to create a Dirty Player goblin. The 'Ooligan is a distruptive force on the field. He's not meant to be simply a Dirty Player.dreamscreator wrote:What I don't get is why Disturbing Presence instead, for example, of Dirty Player?
That's made more sense to me.
I'm not sure I understand your point, Milo, since you could say the same about any other position.Milo wrote: I remember the epic, the wacky, the oddball, the stories I can't stop telling other coaches. That's why I love Blood Bowl. And I think that someday that 'Ooligan could appear in some of those stories.
I love the idea that, even before GW's official 'Ooligan mini has been seen, people are finding all sorts of alternate miniatures to represent him.
I thinnk he's just saying he likes the "build a narrative" side of the game and likes that people are finding cool miniatures that could work as a hooligan like a Goblin herder with cattle prod. Which is driving the stories of their game, and he looks forward hearing the tales.Moraiwe wrote:I'm not sure I understand your point, Milo, since you could say the same about any other position.Milo wrote: I remember the epic, the wacky, the oddball, the stories I can't stop telling other coaches. That's why I love Blood Bowl. And I think that someday that 'Ooligan could appear in some of those stories.
I love the idea that, even before GW's official 'Ooligan mini has been seen, people are finding all sorts of alternate miniatures to represent him.
Er, yeah. That's it in a nutshell. Before anyone else says it, I'm not saying that a desire for narrative is driving the rules creation. I'm just saying that that has historically always been a part of Blood Bowl. The CRP stripped some of that out, and BB2016 is reintroducing some of it as optional rules, and I'm enjoying and appreciating that inclusion.garion wrote:I thinnk he's just saying he likes the "build a narrative" side of the game and likes that people are finding cool miniatures that could work as a hooligan like a Goblin herder with cattle prod. Which is driving the stories of their game, and he looks forward hearing the tales.Moraiwe wrote:I'm not sure I understand your point, Milo, since you could say the same about any other position.Milo wrote: I remember the epic, the wacky, the oddball, the stories I can't stop telling other coaches. That's why I love Blood Bowl. And I think that someday that 'Ooligan could appear in some of those stories.
I love the idea that, even before GW's official 'Ooligan mini has been seen, people are finding all sorts of alternate miniatures to represent him.
Sadly as a Double Skill Pass Block is very unlikely to be seen on a Ooligan. He is a fun addition to the team but probably not compeative. The occasional +3 FAME will be nice and at least making it so both sides have +1 will help the team out. As for other people's suggestions of Dirty Player that is really not the skill you want on your Fan Fave player as you need him to stay on the pitch!Milo wrote:You don't care for the 'Ooligan, fair enough. Yet I think some coaches would enjoy having a Pass Blocking Disturbing Presence with Dodge and Stunty, now only 6 SPPs away. Maybe you'll add one just because you love the model, or maybe another coach will, even if it doesn't substantially improve his team. Not everyone plays BB for the same reasons. Yeesh.
You have to remember that the competitive section of Blood Bowl is actually a pretty small if vocal part of the market. GW have always sold their games as being “beer and pretzel”, something you play with some mates and have fun. The “rule of cool” is an important factor as well, so stupid but fun wins over balanced yet boring.garion wrote:I don't think that's what people are complaining about really. People just want usable players and rules. The Grak and Cumbleberry stuff was poor because the price was wrong and the skill card was missing loner. It was just sloppy from top to bottom. It was also stated that this is an optional rule only not a core one. So the really is not a biggie. Its just poor design and sloppy.spubbbba wrote: I don't think we know what we want. GW come up with overpowered rules for a limited edition pair of models and people are outraged and site this as evidence they have no clue and don't care about the game.
They give one of the weakest teams goblins a couple of extra weapons (one of which is a bit rubbish and the other unknown right now) that are entirely optional and don't change anything else and people moan that this isn't enough.
This time we get Goblins with hooligan who no one in their right mind will take if they want build a competitive goblin team, a team with a chance of winning. So why even bother adding him to the roster? 30k is very big bloat on a team that thrives by keeping its TV down. It does show a real lack of understanding of how people play with this team really. 50k remove disturbing presence and you have a player worth taking, albeit a dull one. I'm still not totally happy with the hooligan being on a sports team either if I'm totally honest. But I could over look that if he had solid rules.