Blood Bowl Tips and Tricks
- Darkson
- Da Spammer
- Posts: 24047
- Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2002 9:04 pm
- Location: The frozen ruins of Felstad
- Contact:
Don't get to downhearted when you play a game and the dice screw you over - it will happen. It happens to the best and worse of coaches. Just shrug your shoulders and move on to the next game.
Reason: ''
Currently an ex-Blood Bowl coach, most likely to be found dying to Armoured Skeletons in the frozen ruins of Felstad, or bleeding into the arena sands of Rome or burning rubber for Mars' entertainment.
- Agentrock
- Emerging Star
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
- Location: Arlington, Tx ~ USA
- Contact:
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 8:51 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
From what I've seen, if you're a good coach you can minimize the effect that any single die roll will have on the game. But bad dice rolling only exacerbates bad coaching.
On the plus side, I've been putting the tactics I've learned here to use, and, while not winning every one, each game now is a hard fought match. Thanks!
On the plus side, I've been putting the tactics I've learned here to use, and, while not winning every one, each game now is a hard fought match. Thanks!

Reason: ''
- Democritus
- Experienced
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 7:59 am
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
It is great to have many re-rolls! I used to play a halfling team with 5 re-rolls on the starting team AND the chef. So I mostly got 6 or more re-rolls EVERY game! After that I have had a hard time playing with normal number of re-rolls on my starting team.
On the other hand halflings need more re-rolls than other teams...
But they also need more benchwarmers...
On the other hand halflings need more re-rolls than other teams...
But they also need more benchwarmers...
Reason: ''
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:58 am
- Location: Sydney - Australia
My Goblin team has 4 re-rolls, but I have twice (in the 7 games I have played with them) finished a half without using all the re-rolls.
Obviously, failing to dodge & then failing the Dodge re-roll is the primary cause of the turnovers in those games(and the reason Gobbos get pretty cheap re-rolls)
sangraal
Obviously, failing to dodge & then failing the Dodge re-roll is the primary cause of the turnovers in those games(and the reason Gobbos get pretty cheap re-rolls)
sangraal
Reason: ''
- Democritus
- Experienced
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 7:59 am
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
- lawquoter
- Legend
- Posts: 2120
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
- Location: St. Louis, Indianapolis, and NOW Kansas City
And do not forget to say NUFFLE SUCKS!Darkson wrote:Don't get to downhearted when you play a game and the dice screw you over - it will happen. It happens to the best and worse of coaches. Just shrug your shoulders and move on to the next game.



Reason: ''
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:17 pm
- Location: Playing Blood Bowl on the Mongolian Plains
- Contact:
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 10:38 am
- Location: Leiden and prou.. er.. in denial.
you obviously haven't played many stunty teams...Djengis_Khan wrote:failing dodge rolls with a stunty gobo!!!
with stunty you don't have any -- so you always get +1 !! and with AG 3 that means you only fail a dodge roll on a 1 or a 2 ..then dodgeing doesn't make much problems .....
Djengis
you dodge a lot, so the averages catch up with you. you're bound to fail some sooner or later, and some games you always fail the first one you make.
sad, sad games, those are....
Reason: ''
-
- Legend
- Posts: 2427
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 7:17 pm
- Location: Playing Blood Bowl on the Mongolian Plains
- Contact:
- Democritus
- Experienced
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 7:59 am
- Location: Uppsala, Sweden
- darthvincor
- Veteran
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 6:37 pm
- Location: Earth
But this way, your opponent needs but one successful blitz to get through your defense.
I prefer using a setup which has two lines of defense, so the opponent would require a block and a blitz to get through:
____|X__X__X|____
_X__|_______|__X_
_X__|X__X__X|__X_
____|___X___|____
So, basically a 3-2-5-1 setup.
I prefer using a setup which has two lines of defense, so the opponent would require a block and a blitz to get through:
____|X__X__X|____
_X__|_______|__X_
_X__|X__X__X|__X_
____|___X___|____
So, basically a 3-2-5-1 setup.
ianwilliams wrote:3-4-4 is a good setup against teams that are looking to score quickly and who aren't quick enough to escape the bottleneck.
I normally set up something like this 3-6-2 (?):
Code: Select all
____|__XXX__|____ ____|_______|____ __X_|X_X_X_X|_X__ _X__|_______|__X_
Reason: ''
- DoubleSkulls
- Da Admin
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
- Location: Back in the UK
- Contact:
You look like you are relying on your LOS to survive. Basically your defence is just as open as mine and has 2 big vulernabilites.darthvincor wrote:I prefer using a setup which has two lines of defense, so the opponent would require a block and a blitz to get through:
____|X__X__X|____
_X__|_______|__X_
_X__|X__X__X|__X_
____|___X___|____
1) Your guys in the widezones are vulnerable to being frenzied (or quick snapped) off the pitch
2) Your players inside of the widezeone can be hit by a 2 dice blitz without requiring a guard - and your opponent only needs a push to open a hole.
Reason: ''
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
- darthvincor
- Veteran
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 6:37 pm
- Location: Earth
What does LOS mean?
Well, my guys in the wide zone are usually ST 4, so that's not really a problem. But you're right about the guys inside the wide zone: one push-back and the defense is open.
Your inside defense is indeed better, with 4 players in a row. In fact, on second thought, your setup is actually much better than mine.
I might use it in my upcoming 1/4-final against the Undead with my Orcs.
I've been using my setup for so many years that I've simply stopped experimenting and considering new ideas. Thanks Ian, I'll let you know how it worked.
Well, my guys in the wide zone are usually ST 4, so that's not really a problem. But you're right about the guys inside the wide zone: one push-back and the defense is open.
Your inside defense is indeed better, with 4 players in a row. In fact, on second thought, your setup is actually much better than mine.
I might use it in my upcoming 1/4-final against the Undead with my Orcs.
I've been using my setup for so many years that I've simply stopped experimenting and considering new ideas. Thanks Ian, I'll let you know how it worked.
ianwilliams wrote: You look like you are relying on your LOS to survive. Basically your defence is just as open as mine and has 2 big vulernabilites.
1) Your guys in the widezones are vulnerable to being frenzied (or quick snapped) off the pitch
2) Your players inside of the widezeone can be hit by a 2 dice blitz without requiring a guard - and your opponent only needs a push to open a hole.
Reason: ''
- darthvincor
- Veteran
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2003 6:37 pm
- Location: Earth
Of course, Line of Scrimage! I should've known.
Actually, I don't rely on them heavily at all, since I usually put my cheapest and least skilled players there. Like skill-less lineman.
[quote="darthvincor"]What does LOS mean?
Well, my guys in the wide zone are usually ST 4, so that's not really a problem. But you're right about the guys inside the wide zone: one push-back and the defense is open.
Your inside defense is indeed better, with 4 players in a row. In fact, on second thought, your setup is actually much better than mine.
I might use it in my upcoming 1/4-final against the Undead with my Orcs.
I've been using my setup for so many years that I've simply stopped experimenting and considering new ideas. Thanks Ian, I'll let you know how it worked.
Actually, I don't rely on them heavily at all, since I usually put my cheapest and least skilled players there. Like skill-less lineman.
[quote="darthvincor"]What does LOS mean?
Well, my guys in the wide zone are usually ST 4, so that's not really a problem. But you're right about the guys inside the wide zone: one push-back and the defense is open.
Your inside defense is indeed better, with 4 players in a row. In fact, on second thought, your setup is actually much better than mine.
I might use it in my upcoming 1/4-final against the Undead with my Orcs.
I've been using my setup for so many years that I've simply stopped experimenting and considering new ideas. Thanks Ian, I'll let you know how it worked.
Reason: ''