Do you want different fouling rules?

Got some ideas for rules? Maybe a skill change or something completely different!!! Tell us here.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Post Reply

If you were to decide, how would you change the fouling rules?

There's no need to have fouling at all. Get rid of it!
0
No votes
It should be easier to get ejected. Ie, make them be used only on key players.
6
15%
They're just fine. Leave them as they are.
24
59%
It should be easier to get away with it. More carnage!
8
20%
It's not called Blood Bowl for nothing. Don't eject players at all.
0
No votes
None of the above. I'll explain below.
3
7%
 
Total votes: 41

User avatar
christer
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 565
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2002 8:54 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Do you want different fouling rules?

Post by christer »

My first poll.. Bare with me if it's weird.. :)

And sorry if it's been polled already..

-- Christer

Reason: ''
User avatar
neoliminal
Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
Ex-Mega Star, now just a Super Star
Posts: 1472
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Location: Utrecht
Contact:

Post by neoliminal »

It is a bit strange... remember that there are likely to be items that you miss, so maybe a catchall answer at the end like "None of these answers works for me."

Reason: ''
User avatar
christer
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 565
Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2002 8:54 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Post by christer »

Good idea. Thank you.

-- Christer

Reason: ''
plasmoid
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5334
Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 8:55 am
Location: Copenhagen
Contact:

Post by plasmoid »

I like the new rules.
I also agree with Chet that it should be easier to get away with a soft foul than with a DP foul.
However, I do not agree that the solution is to make soft fouls harder to catch. Instead, I'd prefer to make DP fouls harder to catch!

With the power of the +2 injury roll, I'd prefer to have a DP fouler with the eye on him sent off on a 3+.
But apart from that, the rules are fine.

(So another spin on it is this: Fouling is A-OK, dirty player isn't).
Martin :)

Reason: ''
User avatar
Thadrin
Moaning Git
Posts: 8079
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Norsca
Contact:

Post by Thadrin »

Sounds like you want someting like the rules I came up with.

Two types of foul, sneaky and blatant. Sneaky fouls may never be assisted. Blatant fouls may be assisted. Sneaky fouls add 1 to the armour roll. Blatant fouls add 3 plus assists.

Dirty player: skill totally changes. DPs treat blatant fouls as sneaky.

Ref roll:
Sneaky foul - ejected on a 6.
Sneaky foul, eye - 5+
Blatant foul - 4+
Blatant foul, eye - 3+

The eye is drawn by a sneaky foul on a REF ROLL of 4+.
The eye is always drawn by Blatant fouls.
The eye lasts d4 (D8/2, round up) turns.

Reason: ''
I know a bear that you don't know. * ICEPELT IS MY HERO.
Master bleater. * Not in the clique.
Member of the "3 digit" club.
User avatar
Piepgrass
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 910
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 6:02 pm
Location: Denmark. Copenhagen

Post by Piepgrass »

I am pretty happy with the new rule, althou i would like to ad a additional penalty on the ejection roll if DP was used on the foul. e.g. 5+ normaly 3+ wiht IGMEOY.

Regards
Poul

Reason: ''
[size=150][color=red]VICIOUS[/color][/size]
The Copenhagen Wight.
User avatar
krybosis
Rookie
Rookie
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 8:00 pm
Location: Line of scrimmage

Post by krybosis »

We have kept a rule that you will only be sended off the pitch at a roll of doubles, but the player will be placed in the reserves box and he will not miss the rest of the match (more carnage :wink:)
We also have rule that if you get Grudge Match, it can be either used by the both teams or none.

Reason: ''
User avatar
wesleytj
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3260
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 3:41 pm
Location: Terre Haute, IN USA
Contact:

I like the rules for fouling the way they are, except...

Post by wesleytj »

I think that given all the skill changes, ref changes and so on, it's hard enough to get away with a foul now, so I really wish that players would get SPP's for them again. That's all I would change.

Other than that I'd say that we have a really good set of fouling rules, best I've played under...which is saying something.

Reason: ''
____________________________________
Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how great your achievements, or how miserable your failures, there will always be about 1 Billion people in China who won't give a damn.
IronAge_Man
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 12:32 pm
Location: Northern Ireland
Contact:

Post by IronAge_Man »

This is a warning to the rest of you...

Several years ago, my brother, myself and two others decided to start up a league based on the 3rd ed. rules including Deathzone. My brother, fielding a standard Undead team, with a Star Player Vampire and two Mummies, systematically butchered every team we could come up with, to such an extent that the rest of us lost interest and went our separate ways...'serves you right for using elves/halflings/goblins' I hear you say; erm, not quite - we mostly used Orcs, Chaos and Dwarfs! It was a rare day indeed if we managed to finish the game with 6 or more players on the pitch (or have 11 for the next game), while the undead just kept coming back. Why the carnage? A combination of lucky rolling, highly effective tactics and hugely overpowered fouling rules, which my clever brother exploited to the maximum - Mummy blocks, player falls down surrounded by zombies, zombie (stacked DP/MB of course) puts boot in (often using team-rerolls on Injury rolls), player stretchered off. If the zombie gets sent off, so what? He's only a zombie. Got loads more of them...often, my brother would leave the ball lying on the floor for the first half, prefering to use rerolls for causing casualties than picking the ball up! I did try Elves (can't remember which flavour) against him once, and though I won the game, the team was a broken shell that never would have recovered in a league situation.

IGMEOY, though I haven't played it yet, means you'll only ever foul if you *really* need too i.e. when you finally get his best player on the floor. With less fouling, it also speeds up the game. The risk of getting sent off should be (and now is) roughly the same as the chance of injuring the prone player, so you of course would use an expendible player to dispose of an important one.

Reason: ''
Post Reply