Turnover question (inaccurate pass caught by team-mate)

Don't understand a particular rule or just need to clarify something? This is the forum for you. With 2 of the BBRC members and the main LRB5/6 writer present at TFF, you're bound to get as good an answer as possible.

Moderator: TFF Mods

Smeborg
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3544
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 2:02 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Turnover question (inaccurate pass caught by team-mate)

Post by Smeborg »

An inaccurate pass scatters, bounces, and is caught by a player on the moving team (not the target of the pass).

Is this a Turnover?

Cheers

Reason: ''
Smeborg the Fleshless
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Post by Grumbledook »

if it just scatters the 3 squares and he catches it, then its not

however since you put the bounce in there I am still not 100% sure, this would mean that the pass was imcomplete which indicates a turnover and then it bounces and you happen to catch it.

anyone got a clue?

Reason: ''
User avatar
Zombie
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2245
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:07 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Post by Zombie »

As long as someone in your team catches it, it's not a turnover. Even if it bounces on the floor, goes in the crowd and gets thrown back, it doesn't matter. As long as someone in your team has it when it finishes moving, it's not a turnover.

Of course, if the pass wasn't accurate, you still don't get a completion.

Reason: ''
narkotic
Da Collector
Posts: 3760
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm

Post by narkotic »

Just a follow up answer:
On the other hand, picking up the ball is another story: a turnover occurs if a player attempts to pick up the ball, fails it, then ball bounces and get caught by a player of the same team.

Reason: ''
User avatar
Asmodan
Legend
Legend
Posts: 4190
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 5:59 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Asmodan »

I you end up with the ball no matter if it bounced on the ground, it will not be a turnover.

Asmodan

Reason: ''
narkotic
Da Collector
Posts: 3760
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm

Post by narkotic »

@Asmodan

I do not know if you've responded to my answer or the original question, but in the LRB it clearly says that it's not a turnover when after an inaccurate pass the ball ends up on another player of the same team (including bounces), whereas it's a turnover when failing to pick up the ball, regardless of whom catching the ball afterwards (p. 9)

Reason: ''
User avatar
Asmodan
Legend
Legend
Posts: 4190
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2002 5:59 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Asmodan »

Narkotic:
I responded to the first question.
Sorry for not making it clear.

Asmodan

Reason: ''
narkotic
Da Collector
Posts: 3760
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 4:27 pm

Post by narkotic »

No problem, I was just confused :smoking:

Reason: ''
Smeborg
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3544
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 2:02 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Thanks

Post by Smeborg »

Thanks, guys -

I know the wording in the LRB is clear, and that it's not a turnover.

However, I had a wrong ruling on this during the tournament, from Andy Hall, of all people! - So I thought I'd check.

By good fortune, the ruling didn't influence the result of the game, but it could have cost me 20 or 30 places!

Cheers

Reason: ''
Smeborg the Fleshless
User avatar
Zombie
Legend
Legend
Posts: 2245
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:07 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Post by Zombie »

If you say Andy Hall, that's no surprise to me. He's been known to be totally oblivious to the rules of this game for many years now. He and Jervis are certainly the two members of the BBRC who know the least about this game. Never believe any word he says.

Reason: ''
Babs
Super Star
Super Star
Posts: 766
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 9:06 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Andy & Jervis Clueless???

Post by Babs »

Thats' a bit harsh Zombie.

After all, Jervis wrote the game. Besides - how well do I know the game? Huh? :wink:

Reason: ''
=-) Babs (crotchety old, washed up has-been)
ex-BBRC member
ex-NAF AUS/NZ Tournament organiser


Make sure you have read the Feudball Novel.
User avatar
DoubleSkulls
Da Admin
Posts: 8219
Joined: Wed May 08, 2002 12:55 pm
Location: Back in the UK
Contact:

Re: Andy & Jervis Clueless???

Post by DoubleSkulls »

Babs wrote:Thats' a bit harsh Zombie.

After all, Jervis wrote the game. Besides - how well do I know the game? Huh? :wink:
Harsh - but not unfair. JJ and AH don't seem to be in touch with the BB community and don't seem to understand the game balance. Look at the experimental lists that they've been coming up with. Most of them are badly broken in one way or another - something almost anyone on this board should have been able to tell them.

Hopefully things will get better - and I suspect part of it is fanatic getting their act together.

Reason: ''
Ian 'Double Skulls' Williams
User avatar
Grumbledook
Boy Band Member
Posts: 10713
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: London Town

Post by Grumbledook »

don't tempt him babs ;]

Reason: ''
User avatar
GalakStarscraper
Godfather of Blood Bowl
Posts: 15882
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2001 12:00 am
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: Andy & Jervis Clueless???

Post by GalakStarscraper »

Babs wrote:Thats' a bit harsh Zombie.

After all, Jervis wrote the game. Besides - how well do I know the game? Huh? :wink:
A bit harsh yes ... but the stuff showing up in BB Mag and although we've agreed it was a bad dream, 4th edition, have burnt down a lot of the credibility factor for understanding the game.

The worst thing about this ruling by Andy Hall at the Blood Bowl tournament is that this rules in on page 13 of the 3RD!!!! edition Rule Book (ie its been a rule for Blood Bowl for 9 freaking years) ... its not like its a new change to game by the BBRC.

I was heartily depressed to hear this one. This would have been a red flag offense for me for SURE if it had been my game as there is no way in h*ll I could have kept my mouth shut if Andy had ruled this way for my game. Of course, I doubt Andy would have had to rule as I would have been able to show my opponent in the BB Handbook the exact page where it says that a pass can bounce on the ground and still be caught and not be a turnover; so I doubt a judge would have been called over.

And before ANYONE suggests this ... its not a confusing rule ... its one of the fun rules in the game and makes for great stories ... this does not need changed .... anyone who suggests it should be should be shot on site (traq drats for fine for this penalty ... real bullets for 2nd offenses) ... hmmm better add ... IMO

Galak

Reason: ''
Smeborg
Legend
Legend
Posts: 3544
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2002 2:02 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Getting Jervis and Andy to PLAY THE GAME!!!

Post by Smeborg »

Thanks guys.

I learned my lesson - don't ask Andy (or Jervis for that matter) for a rules ruling. I should have either solved the problem myself, or called for someone like Brian StJames. Luckily the lesson came for free.

I think the comment about Andy is a bit harsh. However, it does seem to me that both Jervis and Andy may not be playing the game nowadays, and so they can't see play balance or rules issues with blinding force. For example, I think the strength of opinion against Star Players came as a surprise to Jervis - it wouldn't be a surprise if he played with them!

I hope that the non-GW BBRC members (plus the NAF) can exercise some influence over the future of the game (epecially in play balance - influence over rules seems to be there already).

Meanwhile, is there anything the BBRC (and others) can do to get Jervis and Andy to PLAY THE GAME?!?!?!

Cheers

Reason: ''
Smeborg the Fleshless
Post Reply